Archive for the ‘Film’ Category

Nick Cave cocoons himself in purpose – and various accessories – while writing ‘And The Ass Saw the Angel’, Berlin 1986.

Geoff Stanton

Every desk tells a story. Take a look at your own. It may be the only place you can keep ordered; a solitary cove where you can wind life back, expand the surface and skim like a stone. I prefer to sink into mine. For this I recommend two empty bottles of red, a deck of beer coasters, maps, plots, coins, scrolling notebooks and a cup of loose pens. Pitch them headlong into the task. And turn off the computer. Ditch the facebook, the email, the blog, all the crap.

I was recently inspired by Jonathan Raban’s ode to writing aboard his sea-faring crib in Journey to Juneau: “With the floor sashaying underfoot, the chain rumbling on the sea bottom, and the view from the boat’s window’s revolving slowly on the tide, I found the equilibrium I was prone to lose on the unstable land. On winter mornings I’d fire up the heater, light the lamps and work with an intense single mindedness that evaded me at home. The creaks and groans, the smells of parrafin and diesel, were conducive to thinking and remembering”.

But whether it’s via a hatch, a cup of tea, a bottle of whiskey, a pool of blood, four walls of chaos and a nap -  the desk is a great helm.  Here’s a classical tour of some of the big guys; their desks, methods, modes for writing the masterpiece that will keep the ghost lingering.

Dalton Trumbo gets down to work, Mitzi Trumbo/AP Images

Hollywood heavyweight and screenwriting legend Dalton Trumbo. He did most of his writing sitting in the tub, working on a tray suspended over suds. According to his wife, he’d spend days in the bathroom, writing, soaking and smoking – Kirk Douglas remarked that Trumbo sometimes smoked up to six packs of cigarettes a day.

The picture comfort is instructive; next time you’re wasting time in a bath, remember it was here Trumbo wrote films such as The Sandpiper (1965) for Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton, The Horsemen (1971) for director John Frankenheimer and his last film, Papillon (1973). And all that after he was blacklisted by the House Un-American Activities Committee in 1950 – during which time he focused his skills on letter writing. Although he did posthumously win an Academy Award for secretly writing Roman Holiday (1953).

Truman Capote and his big ideas, 1977, Arnold Newman.

Inspiration. A glass of sherry in one hand and a pencil in another. “I am a completely horizontal author” Truman Capote told the Paris Review in 1957. “I can’t think unless I’m lying down, either in bed or stretched on a couch and with a cigarette and coffee handy. I’ve got to be puffing and sipping. As the afternoon wears on, I shift from coffee to mint tea to sherry to martinis. No, I don’t use a typewriter. Not in the beginning. I write my first version in longhand (pencil). Then I do a complete revision, also in longhand.”

Ernest Hemingway at the Standing Desk on the Balcony of Bill Davis’s home near Malaga, Life/Time Images.

Hemingway wrote 500 words a day – mostly in the mornings to avoid the heat. A prolific writer, he also knew when to stop. In a letter to F. Scott Fitzgerald in 1934, he wrote, “I write one page of masterpiece to ninety-one pages of shit. I try to put the shit in the wastebasket.”

Hemingway discovered the standing desk method from his editor at Charles Scribner’s Sons, Maxwell Perkins, after an injury prevented him from spending prolonged amounts of time sitting down. In the 18th and 19th centuries, nearly everyone used a standing desk. AE Hotchner recalls Hemingway’s home set-up in Havana, in Papa Hemingway: A Personal Memoir:

“In Ernest’s room there was a large desk covered with stacks of letters, magazines, and newspaper clippings, a small sack of carnivores’ teeth, two unwound clocks, shoehorns, an unfilled pen in an onyx holder, a wood carved zebra, wart hog, rhino and lion in single file, and a wide-assortment of souvenirs, mementos and good luck charms. He never worked at the desk. Instead, he used a stand up work place he had fashioned out of a bookcase near his bed. His portable typewriter was snugged in there and papers were spread along the top of the bookcase on either side of it. He used a reading board for longhand writing.”

“I hate writing. I love having written.” Dorothy Parker, Life/Time images.

“Ducking for apples” said Dorothy Parker. “Change one letter and it’s the story of my life.” Dorothy Parker; American poet, short story writer, critic, satirist – and yet another blacklisted name during the 1950s.  In her day she was known as a ‘wisecracker‘ – a label that may have been applied to Oscar Wilde had he been born in New Jersey – but one Parker despised. Yet her literary output and reputation for sharp wit has endured.

Dorothy Parker in the midst of writer’s block. She sent this telegram to her editor, Pascal Covici, as she couldn’t bring herself to look him “in the voice.”

Asked by a journalist during an interview, “Where’s the best place to write?” Parker replied, “In your head.” And her head was clocked in constantly, from speakeasies through three marriages (two to the same man – “I put all my eggs in one bastard”), the heavy drinking and smoking and some unhappiness. But her style and wit continue to entertain readers. “I’d like to have money. And I’d like to be a good writer. These two can come together, and I hope they will, but if that’s too adorable, I’d rather have money.”

Nearly finished? Lost in spools. The draft of Jack Kerouac’s Beat-defining phenomenon ‘On the Road’ appeared to the world in April 1951 as a single 36 metre (120-foot) role of paper.

Fueled by the same fever as his characters, Jack Kerouac racked a word-count to help him set course for a complete novel. “That’s not writing” Capote famously remarked,”that’s typing”. But when the whiskey and malt loosened its grip, habits at the Kerouac table-top were disciplined. From the time of first novel The Town and the City Kerouac kept a log; between 1,000 to 5,000 words a night.He also created a formula to mimic the ‘batting average’. The goal was a .400 batting average – on par with Ted Williams.

Kerouac’s fierce verbal also invoked a set of commandments, tacked on the wall of Allen Ginsberg’s hotel room in North Beach a year before Ginsberg published Howl.

“Scribbled secret notebooks, and wild typewritten pages, for yr own joy. Submissive to everything, open, listening. Try never get drunk outside yr own house. Be in love with yr life. Accept loss forever. Believe in the holy contour of life. Struggle to sketch the flow that already exists intact in mind. Don’t think of words when you stop but to see picture better”

After hours. Jack Kerouac, Lucien Carr, Allen Ginsber, 1959. Image John Cohen/Hulton Archive

Alfred Hitchcock with his 1930′s Black Underwood typewriter – and cocktail bar. “More work was done on the script in the evening over cocktails, than any other time” said collaborator Charles Bennett. Life/Time images.

“In the morning, I used to get up and pick up Hitch in Cromwell Road, where he lived, at ten o’clock exactly” says screenwriter Charles Bennett, who collaborated with Hitchcock from his earliest ‘talkies’ – including The Man Who Knew Too Much in 1934 – establishing the innovative wit, freshness and originality Hitchcock subsequently demanded of his writers. “He would be sitting on the curb waiting for me. And then we would go to the studio where we would discuss the script and what I was doing with it”.

“Then at about one o’clock, everything would stop, and we’d go to lunch, always at the Mayfair Hotel, and have a wonderful lunch. Then come back and at that point, Hitch would usually go to sleep in the office, and I would do a little work, and possibly doze off too slightly. At about five o’clock, we would go back to Hitchcock’s flat where we would start having nice cocktails for the evening, and talk more and more and more about the script. And I think more work was done on the script in the evening over cocktails, than any other time.”

Tennessee Williams faces a terrible question, Life/Time images

“I write as soon as I get up in the morning – facing that terrible question as soon as possible. Some mornings I get up and what I’ve been working on is repugnant to me. So then I shift to some other thing I’ve been working on. I find it absolutely necessary to have two things going on at once, then I can shift back and forth” (Tennessee Williams interview with John Gruen, 1965)

William Faulkner, 1943. “My own experience has been that the tools I need for my trade are paper, tobacco, food, and a little whiskey. Life/ Time images.

“I can’t write if someone else is in the house, not even the cleaning woman” said Patricia Highsmith, Tom Ripley creator, and bringer of many other thrillers – including Hitchcock’s ‘Stranger’s on a Train’.”I have Graham Greene’s telephone number, but I wouldn’t dream of using it. I don’t seek out writers because we all want to be alone.”

Roald Dahl in his writing hut.

Roald Dahl created space the same way his mind burrowed out a giant peach; fantastically. He believed a writing space should be highly personal. His writing hut was closed to everyone, including family. A wing-back chair hollowed out to comfort a bad back, a writing board made from wood and green baize fitted across the arms. An electric heater hung directly overhead.

The hut was also decked with curios and artifacts; a piece of his own hip bone, his own preserved spinal shavings, fossils, magazines, fan letters, old photos, family totems, bookmarks drawn specially for him by friend and illustrator Quentin Blake (he only ever seen the interior once) and an enormous ball of wrapper foil slow-built from years of lunching on Cadbury’s chocolate.

Now that the great writing chair is empty you can take an interactive tour of the hut.

“As things stand now, I am going to be a writer. I’m not sure that I’m going to be a good one or even a self-supporting one, but until the dark thumb of fate presses me to the dust and says ‘you are nothing’, I will be a writer.”, Hunter S Thompson.

Hunter S. Thompson is best known for writing in a spin of campaign trails, Hell’s Angels, Holiday Inns, Wild Turkey, mescalin and an occasional lawyer. But while attending Columbia University School of General Studies and taking creative writing, he also worked at Time for $51 a week as a copy boy.  During this stint he would sneak off into a room with a typewriter and rewrite his favorite author’s books, including F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gastby and Ernest Hemingway’s A Farewell to Arms, before moving on.

As far as I’m concerned, it’s a damned shame that a field as potentially dynamic and vital as journalism should be overrun with dullards, bums, and hacks, hag-ridden with myopia, apathy, and complacence, and generally stuck in a bog of stagnant mediocrity. If this is what you’re trying to get The Sun away from, then I think I’d like to work for you. (Thompson’s Cover letter to Vancouver Sun, looking for a job, 1957)

Henry Miller in his office

Euchrid’s Crib, Nick Cave in Yorkestrasse, West Berlin, 1985, Image by Bleddyn Butcher.

Human song-sheaf Nick Cave has replaced harmful addictions with work since the eighties, and implies as much himself: “Writing is a necessary thing for me, just to keep myself level. It has beneficial effects on my life”. When he bunked down in Berlin to write the And the Ass Saw The Angel, it seemed his method was not so different from songwriting – or taking drugs. “I write a lot, and very often I write a couple of lines that are particularly revealing in some kind of way. And then as a few more lines get added and a piece gets added, eventually the song pretty much takes over and you can’t really find a way to change those things.”

And isn’t that what it’s all about?

“More Things to Remember…”, Nick Cave, Melbourne Arts Centre


									

Dr Alfred Kinsey and Kenneth Anger unearth Aleister Crowley’s Satanic frescoes in Thelema Abbey, Sicily.

Geoff Stanton

“As Keith and Anita learned more about the powers of darkness, they grew secretive. They knew the subject frightened me, and they got rid of me when Kenneth Anger or other demonic friends came to call. Keith was impressed when Kenneth ticked off all the great artistic rebels who’d flirted with black magic – Blake, Byron, Oscar Wilde, Yeats and De Quincey…” (Tony Sanchez, Up and Down with the Rolling Stones)

There is something largely missing from popular cinema and music these days, and that’s Satan. I might be sounding old-fashioned – but Satanism had some style. While 1969 turned many things bad – Hells Angels, heroin, peyote, Charles Manson, Dick Van Dyke – Kenneth Anger’s pact with the devil was reaping psychedelic fruit. Anger was a powerful force. His grasp of the symbolic – reckoned with the Satanic creed of ‘Do What Thou Wilt’ – alchemised into works such as Scorpio Rising and Invocation of My Demon Brother, and dealt the decade a final score.

And along the way he also scared some people. In fact, his “awesomely evil 11-minute masterpiece” Invocation – starring himself, Anton LaVey (the High Priest of the Church of Satan), Charles Manson sidekick Bobby Beausoleil (later to serve life imprisonment with Manson for first degree murder), and featuring documentary footage from a satanic cat funeral, a ceremonial skull smoking session, a mummified psychic and a synthesized Moog soundtrack by Mick Jagger – was not as out of this world as the man himself.

Kenneth Anger, camera in crowd, shooting footage that will end up in ‘Invocation of My Demon Brother’.

“We all were just a little afraid of Kenneth” said Tony Sanchez, the Rolling Stones’ drug manager, in his Stones biography. “Again and again inexplicable things involving him would happen. Once, for example, Robert Fraser arranged an opening party for some white sculptures that John Lennon and Yoko Ono had created. I saw Kenneth clearly at the party, but when I went across to talk to him he seemed to have vanished.

“I thought little of it at the time until that afternoon when Anita, Marianne, Keith and Mick all said that they too had seen Kenneth but had been unable to find him. ‘Anyway’ said Anita ‘it’s very strange because Kenneth told me he wouldn’t be able to come to the exhibition because he was going away on business in Germany’. Kenneth didn’t return to London for two weeks, and by then numerous people all remarked on having seen Kenneth across the crowded room, but had been unable to speak to him. Eventually we asked almost everyone who had been there if they has spoken to him – and none of them had”.

Kenneth Anger sporting his trademark Lucifer tattoo.

The myth of Kenneth Anger quickly spread through the shakers’ inner circles.  The Rolling Stones, Marianne Faithful, Jimmy Page – all were eager to move in its current. “Kenneth Anger told me I was his right hand man” Keith Richards told Rolling Stone Magazine. “It’s just what you feel. Whether you’ve got that good and evil thing together. Left-hand path, right hand path, how far do you want to go down? Once you start there’s no going back.”

By ’69 Anger was considered a fierce original in Europe and the United States – both influential and genuinely independent.  From his early 1947 film Fireworks, through to Inauguration of the Pleasure Dome (1954) and Lucifer Rising (1972), Anger became, as Jonas Mekas put it “one of the most complex personalities working in cinema.  Whatever he does, be it cinema or life, he does it fully, to the bottom… Kenneth Anger, the True Cosmic Explorer.”

The Kenneth Anger enigma begins in 1935, back-dated by his own hand, where he claimed to have performed the role of the Changeling Prince in the Warner Brothers film A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Whether or not the child was him is debatable – studio key books state the character was played by a girl named Sheila Brown. Anger’s biographer denies this. Bullshit or not, the claim somehow adds to Anger’s ability to transcend the chair.

“Kenneth Anger claimed to be a Magus, though he refused to reveal whether toad sacrifices had been necessary for his promotion” wrote Sanchez. “What is indisputable is that Anger does appear to have certain powers, and he has been linked with extraordinary incidents.”

Kenneth Anger/ Sheila Brown as The Changleing Prince from 1935′s Midsummer Night’s Dream. IMDB goes with Brown. His later work Rabbit’s Moon was also influenced by this film.

At the Cinémathèque Française, 1955.

With an interest in the occult piqued at an early age by Frank L Baum’s Oz books, by the 1950s Anger was travelling the Satanic grottoes of Europe – voyaging firstly through Italy to make a film about the sixteenth century occultist Cardinal d’Este, before emerging in Paris around 1955 (where he met Jean Cocteau). He continued to produce short films, filming 20 minutes of footage for his film Rabbit’s Moon (set under a blue filter, it involves a clown longing for the moon) at the Films du Pantheon Studio. When the studio closed the production down, footage was stored in the labyrinthine archive of the Cinémathèque Française.

In 1955 Anger spent three months in Cefalu, Sicily to shoot a documentary about Aleister Crowley’s frescoes in Thelema Abbey. The Abbey of Thelema was a small villa establised as a temple and spiritual centre by Crowley  in 1920. The name was taken from Rabelais’ satire Gargantua and Pantagruel, where the Abbey of Thélème was an ‘anti-monastery’ in which inhabitants spent time “not in laws, statutes, or rules, but according to their own free will and pleasure.”

Thelema Abbey, Cefalù, Sicily, circa Kenneth Anger.

Early Hollywood star Jane Wolfe at Abbey of Thelema at Cefalù, Sicily. She lived there from 1920 until it closed in 1923. Wolfe kept records of magic practice, later published by the College of Thelema in Northern California, as The Cefalu Diaries. She gave up a Hollywood career to join Crowley.

Anger’s film would have made an fascinating excursion – complete with shuddering organ, grotesque undercoats and a resident evil, no doubt. But unfortunately it has been lost. “The film was made for Houlton Television which was  a branch of Picture Post – an extinct British Magazine.” said Anger “They lost it. I tried to find it and it’s untraceable. I lived in Crowley’s house, alone, but that kind of thing doesn’t bother me. I had to. It was the only way to get it done.

“I spent three months there scraping the whitewash, which had turned to stone, off the walls. They were still there – all those hyper-psychedelic murals: goblins and demons in fabulous color, scarlet and pumpkin-red. Actually they were good paintings, similar in feel to Ensor”.

But it was the 1960s that truly brought the demons to the surface.

Satan was getting a lot of press. And Anton LaVey – founder and head of the Church of Satan – was spearheading business. The symbolism and ritual of the occult appealed to the anti-establishment; hippies were looking further than flowers, thinkers were pressing the boundaries. On the screen, occult-obsessed films had sprung from the drying patch of Hammer horror – movies such as Eye of the Devil (starring Roman Polanksi’s beautiful but doomed wife Sharon Tate), The Devil Rides Out, The Devils Own and – perhaps – later on The Exorcist. Polanski’s Rosemary’s Baby was the cream of the crop – LaVey adding it was “the best paid commercial for Satanism since the Inquisition.”

Anton LaVey in Kenneth Anger’s Invocation of My Brother Demon. He plays … Satan! He would later be technical adviser for The Devil’s Rain, a story of a cult of devil worshippers starring Ernest Borgnine, William Shatner, Tom Skerritt, and John Travolta.

In 1966 blonde starlet Jayne Mansfield - reputedly a Church of Satan Priestess (following some publicity shots she did with LaVey) -  stole the headlines after being virtually decapitated in a car accident, alongside boyfriend Sam Brody. Anton LaVey, reportedly obsessed with Mansfield, took it badly. He had put the curse on Brody.

Gossip now dragged Satan through the undertow of magazines and media. And LaVey seized the wheel. In 1969 he publicly married journalist John Raymond and socialite Judith Case, performed a satanic funeral of Navy machinist-repairman Edward Olsen at Treasure Island (reciting the eulogy while a Navy musician played Taps), performed a satanic baptism on his own 3-year-old daughter Zeena (who chewed gum throughout), appeared on Johnny Carson’s seventh anniversary show and released the Satanic Bible.

A Satanic wedding in the 1960s.

Satanists Michael Aquino and Anton LaVey with Sammy Davis Jr, Circle Star Theater. Davis reportedly noticed Anton LaVey in the front row, and gave him the Sign of the Horns. He was later presented with a second-degree certificate, medallion, and membership card for the Church of Satan.

LaVey and Jayne Mansfield in a series of publicity shots, shortly before her death.

It was also around this time Anger began to gather a reputation. And around the time he started working on his opus, Lucifer Rising.

Again to Sanchez: “His life’s work was to have been a film of homage to the devil, Lucifer Rising. For the role of Lucifer Anger employed a good looking young man named Bobby Beausoleil, who played guitar with the Californian rock band Love. Mysteriously, after many months of filming, Beausoleil appeared to go beserk and carried out a singularly bestial murder which ended with his writing on a wall with his victim’s blood”.

Rumour has it that Beausoleil was kicked out by Anger after he hid an enormous parcel of marijuana in house. Anger later claimed that the guitarist took the footage for Lucifer Rising with him, and buried it somewhere in Death Valley. Kenneth Anger therefore placed ‘the curse of the frog’ on him – by trapping a frog in a well.

It was not long afterwards that  Beausoleil became associated with the Manson family and murdered music teacher Gary Hinman – after a bulk sale of LSD to some bikers went bad. He is currently serving a life sentence for first degree murder.

Bobby Beausoleil on the doorstep of Anger’s Russian House, ‘Do What Thou Wilt’. Bobby Beausoleil did, and is now spending his life in prison. 

The role of Lucifer was subsequently offered to Mick Jagger, with Jimmy Page brought in to compose the soundtrack. Page’s interest in the occult is well known – from the early seventies he owned an occult bookshop and publishing house, “The Equinox Booksellers and Publishers” in Kensington High Street, London. The company published a facsimile of English occultist’s Aleister Crowley’s 1904 edition of The Goetia. Page had also purchased and lived in Crowley’s estate of Boleskine – an old home by the side of Loch Ness in Scotland, originally purchased by Crowley because its isolation and layout reflected the order required to speak to spirits, as per instructions found in the The Book of the Sacred Magick of Abra-Melin the Mage.

“I feel Aleister Crowley is a misunderstood genius of the 20th century” Page told Sounds Magazine in 1978. “Because his whole thing was liberation of the person, of the entity, and that restrictions would foul you up, lead to frustration which leads to violence, crime, mental breakdown, depending on what sort of makeup you have underneath. The further this age we’re in now gets into technology and alienation, a lot of the points he’s made seem to manifest themselves all down the line.”

For personal reasons – heroin – Page never completed the job. What he did deliver was twenty-three minutes of music three years later – five minutes short of Anger’s demands and the final cut. Page recently released the recording as ‘Lucifer Rising and Other Soundtracks’ in 2012.

Anger’s view of Page has meanwhile soured over the years.  “He’s a multi-millionaire miser,” he told Mark Berry, in a great interview for Bizarre Magazine. “He and Charlotte, that horrible vampire girl – the druggie that got him on heroin – they’re both junkies. They had so many servants, yet they would never offer me a cup of tea or a sandwich. Which is such a mistake on their part because I put the curse of king Midas on them. If you’re greedy and just amass gold you’ll get an illness. So I did turn her and Jimmy Page into statues of gold because they’ve both lost their minds. He can’t write songs anymore.”

The final soundtrack was delivered – remarkably – by the incarcerated Beausoleil. And it is quite stunning; an hypnotic reel of looping psychedelic guitar, with ancient harmonics fuzzing at the core. It was Anger’s most expensive film because it involved a trip to Egypt. In the film Marianne Faithfull played Lilith – a demon. “I said to Marianne Faithfull, don’t bring any drugs because they’ll execute you” recalled Anger. “So she hid her heroin in her makeup box underneath her face powder. I think she was powdering her face with heroin.”

Marianne Faithfull before The Sphinx as Lilith the demon, in Kenneth Anger’s Lucifer Rising.

And the hallucinogenic stories from The Rolling Stones camp meanwhile continued to flourish. Tony Sanchez relates Anger’s participation in the wedding of Kieth Richards and Anita Pallenberg – which he suggested be a pagan ceremony. He then explained that the door of the house where the ceremony is held must be painted gold with a magical paint containing special herbs, which represent the sun.

“The next morning I was awakened by Anita yelling hysterically to Keith from the hallway” says Sanchez. “I pulled on my dressing gown and ran downstairs to see what all the commotion was about. ‘Look Tony, look’ she screamed pointing to the door. I was astonished to discover that it had been fastidiously painted inside and out in gold. ‘It must have been Kenneth, but I can’t work out how he did it’ said Keith. ‘The security people put the strongest lock you can buy in that door, and there’s no way anyone could have got a spare key.’ ‘It must be another of Kenneth’s powers’ said Anita. ‘It means he can fly into the house anytime he wants to’.

On the subject of magic, Anger cryptically told Mark Berry: “I never talk about it with people that aren’t magicians. Because they would think you were a fucking liar.”

Anger himself offers a more sober assessment of his transmuting abilities. In Out! Demons Out!: An Oral History of the 1967 Exorcism of the Pentagon, Anger recalled his method of infiltrating the Pentagon to attack Mars, the God of War. “I just walked right in. I had studied how the Pentagon staff were dressed, and I was just like them. I wore a dark blue conservative suit. I even had a small American flag on my lapel. There were these hothead lefties, who, their idea was they would take over and kill the capitalists – not very practical.

“I had a map of the Pentagon. I went into every single men’s room and left—in a place where it was bound to be discovered, usually on the seat —a talisman which was written on parchment paper, drawn in india ink. Each one was drawn individually using one of Crowley’s talismans as my guide. They probably could figure out it was something occult. They know about those things, and they have a reference library.”

“He’s still our ruling god. Mars loves bloodshed, and he is a force that’s still operating in the world—it’s a force that according to modern thinking is irrational, but nevertheless there. Freud would have called it the unconscious or something but I believe that these are actual living entities. Not ‘living’ in the way like humans living and breathing, [but] living in a way that are much beyond our capacity, because they’ll never die.

“I didn’t stop until I had scattered all 93 of my talismans—because 93 is a sacred number for Crowley. Then I walked out, it was all very inconspicuous. The security guard looked at me and gave me a nice look, like we’re all looking after each other. If I’d been stopped and put in handcuffs that would’ve been unpleasant. That isn’t the way I want to spend my time in Washington—I had a ticket to the opera for later that week.

Film makers Donald Cammell, Dennis Hopper, Alejandro Jodorowsky & Kenneth Anger. Message to Hollywood 2012: Pull your socks up and make some decent pacts.

By the 1980s Anger was living largely in retirement, screening his films at universities and film festivals. He was also living off the pulp-gossip of his Hollywood Babylon books 1 and 2, which trawled through the scandalous underbelly of Hollywood stardom. They contained highly litigious litanies of debauch and revelation (including the Fatty Arbuckle sexual assault scandal, the murder of William Desmond Taylor, the Hollywood Blacklist and the murder of Sharon Tate) most of which continue to be debunked. Film historian Kevin Brownlow criticized the work, quoting Anger as saying his research method was “mental telepathy, mostly”.  A documentary of Anger called Kenneth Anger’s Magick was also released around this time. Its director Kit Fitzgerald claimed Anger told her he was now so broke he had been forced to sell his air conditioner.

Anger has said Hollywood Babylon 3 has been written, but is on hold in his top drawer – he can’t afford the inevitable litigation from The Church of Scientology. He has called today’s Hollywood a “dried-out prune of a place”, with stars that are not worth gossiping about. “I covered most of the people who were interesting to me in the first two books.”

Mental telepathy – mostly.

But among the murders, madness, drug addictions and demons, the best of Kenneth Anger stands out for the hypnotic power of his films. “Like many people, I was astonished when I saw Kenneth Anger’s Scorpio Rising for the first time,” Martin Scorsese said in an introduction to the released DVD. “Every cut, every camera movement, every color, and every texture seemed, somehow, inevitable, in the same way that images of the Virgin in Renaissance painting seem inevitable—in other words, pre-existing but dormant, and brought back to life through some kind of evocation.” Anger’s splicing of pop soundtracks with imagery – as far back as 1964 – is also regarded as pioneering, influencing Scorsese’s generation first-hand.

And whether his other-world powers remain intact or not, Anger today remains a rarity and a raconteur, stranded somewhere between Old Hollywood and modern oblivion. He remains both reviled and respected. Depending on where you stand.

As mentioned, there are a number of interesting interviews with the man. Check out Mark Berry’s intriguing chat with the bloke. Below are videos Lucifer Rising, Anger’s commentary on Invocation of My Demon Brother and lastly his 2004 revisit to the Crowley’s Thelema Abbey.

Geoff Stanton

North Korean dictator Kim Jong-il may long remain an enigma wrapped in a zip-suit. But there was one blaring passion on the khaki sleeve. He loved films. A fan of Hong Kong action, horror, James Bond, Elizabeth Taylor – he also authored On the Art of the Cinema and, in the late seventies, became a producer.

In fact, he fast-tracked his career quicker than most Hollywood hotshots – by kidnapping famous South Korean director Shin Sang-ok and his ex-wife, movie star Choi Eun-hee, keeping them under lock and key until they helped him make movies. Most notably Pulgasari, a socialist remake of Godzilla.

Relationships got off to a rocky start. Shin says that shortly after arriving in Pyongyang he made several attempts to escape, only to end up with four years at Prison No 6. “Tasting bile all the time,” he wrote. “I experienced the limits of human beings.”

Shin endured four years in the all-male prison – wondering whether his ex-wife was dead – while being fed a diet of grass, salt, rice and Party dogma. When he was finally released in 1983 Kim apologised for the unfriendly welcome, blaming a misunderstandings by officials. He also made a personal apology for taking so long to get back to them, explaining it had been busy at the office.

In the 70s Kim had created the Mount Paeku Creative Group studio – designed to illuminate global cinema aisles with the light of the Korea Workers’ Party. But, possibly under the threat of exile or death, Kim’s creative team faced a communal creative block.

“The North’s film-makers are just doing perfunctory work” he later confided. “They don’t have any new ideas. Their works have the same expressions, redundancies, the same old plots. All our movies are filled with crying and sobbing. I didn’t order them to portray that kind of thing.”

By 1978 Kim Jong-il was firmly disenchanted. But a solution soon presented itself.

Kim Jong-il on set as Producer. Appreciating the power of film, Kim wrote in book On the Art of Cinema that “A film with an untidy plot cannot grip the audience and define their emotional response.”

South Korean director Shin Sang-ok, widely regarded as the Orson Welles of the peninsula, had modernised movies when people needed them most. In the wake of the Korean war he make at least 60 movies in 20 years. He and his wife, the well-known actress Choi Eun-hee, were well placed amongst Seoul’s celebrity set.

But in 1978 Shin clashed with the repressive government of General Park Chung Hee. His studio was closed. Kim grabbed the opportunity and lured the two to Repulse Bay in Hong Kong on a bogus business trip. Choi was the first to disappear after heading over to discuss an acting job. Concerned, Shin followed her trail – only to be wrapped in plastic, with a chloroform-soaked sack over the head on his way home from dinner.

And now, having now recruited the best film talent available for the venture, it was time to get down to work. Kim and his expanded company were going to workshop some ideas. “Kim Jong-il was like any ordinary young man.” Shin San-Ok told the BBC in 2003.  ”He liked action movies, sex movies, horror movies”. When it came to casting around for subject matter, Shin says there were “fewer restrictions than is commonly believed”.

Choi Eun-hee in Shin’s Flower from Hell. From 1955 to 1985, Choi appeared in eighty-one films. She received the award for best actress at the Moscow International Film Festival in 1985, for her part in the film Sogum

“He listened to me because we were from South Korea,” Shin also told The Guardian in 2003. “Even though we criticised some things, he wanted us to be honest. Others would have been killed for speaking so honestly”.

But all ideas had to be approved by Kim Jong-il as facets of his ideology. In his book On the Art of Cinema Kim compares actors and directors to generals who must master their craft. Kim’s book also suggests that film-makers avoid unrealistic movies about “the colourful lives of flamboyant characters. In the final analysis, a director who pins his hopes on finding a ‘suitable actor’ is taking a gamble in his creative work. And no director who relies on luck in creative work has ever achieved real success.”

Shin soon saw his career resurrected in a way he had never imagined.

Leaving the grass and water behind, Shin was soon promoted with an annual pay cheque of $3m for personal or professional use. He was also mixing in cognac with the higher ranks of the North Korea’s social set.

“Shall we make Mr Shin one of our regular guests?” Kim suggested at a birthday party for one of his generals. Military men meanwhile fawned over the despot-to-be and young women screamed: “Long live the great leader!”. In an exceptionally rare moment of candour, Kim said: “Mr Shin, all that is bogus. It’s just pretense.”

Shin was trusted enough to fly to east Berlin for location shots – shadowed by escorts. He rejected his wife’s suggestion of doing a runner, telling her an escape required planning. Meanwhile, to his own surprise, he found was busy planning the course of his new career.

Kim Jong-il in a former life as a hassled looking Film Producer, 1984 AFP/Getty Images.

Within the new creative parameters, Shin’s work began to flourish. In 1984 he was able to produce what he regarded as his finest film, Runaway – the story of a wandering Korean family of 1920s Manchuria dealing with Japanese oppression.

But this story is more known for spawning Pulgasari; Kim Jong-il’s C grade monster-movie masterpiece. Based on a legend of the 14th-century Koryo monarchy, Pulgasari probably owes most to Godzilla. Shin invited some monster-movie veterans from Japan’s legendary Toho Studio to his own – which now held 700 employees – to help with the movie after Kim guaranteed their safety. The troupe included Kenpachiro Satsuma, the second actor to wear the Godzilla suit; now rubber-bound as the lumbering Pulgasari.

Kenpachiro Satsuma (left) as Godzilla. He was the man behind the rubber from 1984-1995.

Satsuma as the the mighty Pulgasari, North Korea 1985.

Starting out as a dot of rice, Pulgasari becomes a monster of the people. While farmers starve under the king’s rule, the hapless creature comes to life, eats iron, grows, rolls through the countryside unfurling his wrath – past endless scenic shots of the people’s folk dances (as decreed in the guidelines of On the Art of the Cinema) and on to explosive ruin. Pulgasari has since taken a seat on the high right-hand of awful suitified monster movies.

But Kim liked it. In fact, he saw it as a victory. He ordered truckloads of pheasant, deer, wild geese for the movie crew to feast on. Plans were made for a joint venture with a company in Austria to distribute the film. Kim trusted the director to travel to western Europe for a business meeting.

He shouldn’t have.

Shin and his wife decided to strike the iron while it was hot. Ducking into a US embassy, Shin pulled stumps on his NK production company for good. “To be in Korea living a good life ourselves and enjoying movies while everyone else was not free was not happiness, but agony,” he wrote. It was a shame. The next project was inspired by John Wayne’s appearance as Genghis Khan in The Conqueror. Both Shin and Kim had long wanted to make an ‘authentic’ version – they both shared enthusiasm on the subject of invading hordes.

The Kim Jong-il Summer Collection. North Korea’s Uriminzokkiri site reported that the dictator’s trademark zip-up suit had become a worldwide fashion craze. The piece quoted an unidentified French fashion expert as saying: “Kim Jong-Il mode, which is now spreading expeditiously worldwide, is something unprecedented in the world’s history.”

After the embarrassing escape of his star colleagues, Kim Jong-il shelved Pulgasari along with every other Shin film, humbly retiring into the role of despot. He never again appeared on a movie credit as Producer.

Shin’s work with Kim yielded seven films. He even introduced the first kiss to North Korean cinema. Pulgasari meanwhile was not seen outside the country until 1998 – during a short and cautiously optimistic moment of openness in the North. The film bombed.

In 2001 Shin Sang-ok planned to screen his favourite work, Runaway, at the Pusan International film festival. Seoul halted the showing, banning any screening that could benefit the North. But, happily, there was one successful instance of reunification. During their stay in Pyongyang Shin and Choi re-married – at Kim Jong-il’s recommendation.

Kim Jong-il’s Pyongyang Picture Show. Seat number presumably stamped on ticket. Image Copyright Malte Herwig, 2008.

Dennis Hopper: Bruce Conner (in tub), Toni Basil, Teri Garr and Ann Marshall, 1965. via Photographs 1961-1967 (Taschen)/© The Dennis Hopper Trust

By Geoff Stanton

Before his ferocious ascent to Hollywood new-guard and celebrated psychotic, a young Dennis Hopper kept the flame guttering through photography.  Parties, bar rooms, film sets, diners, bull fights, friends, artists, riots, bikers, the backrooms of celebrity – through the blizzard of the sixites Hopper was never without his camera. “I never made a cent from these photos” he said. “They cost me money but kept me alive … They were the only creative outlet I had for these years until Easy Rider. (After that) … I never carried a camera again.”

In the early years he had pocketed a handful of roles, notably alongside friend James Dean – as a member of the juvenile delinquent gang in Rebel Without a Cause (1955), and in Giant (1956), as the sensitive son of Texan oil millionaire Rock Hudson and Elizabeth Taylor. He also carved a niche for himself as slightly psychotic villains in westerns such as Gunfight at the OK Corral (1956) (“I don’t know why I get into gunfights. I guess sometimes I just get lonely”) and From Hell to Texas (1958).

Hopper with Natalie Wood and James Dean, 'Rebel Without a Cause' (1955)

But when his then-wife Brooke Hayward gave him a 35mm Nikon camera for his birthday in 1961, he dedicated himself “like an alcoholic”. Along with the film icons and rock stars, Hopper’s exceptional work captures many watershed moments of the 1960s, such as Martin Luther King’s 1963 March on Washington and the 1965 Selma-to-Montgomery Freedom March, as well as the Sunset Strip curfew riots and Monterey Pop Festival. “I wanted to document something. I wanted to leave something that I thought would be a record …whether it was Martin Luther King, the hippies, or whether it was the artist”.

Hopper recalled that it was Marlon Brando who got him involved in one of the most volatile events – the Selma-to-Montgomery March. “He pulled up in his car and said, ‘What are you doing day after tomorrow?’ and I said, ‘Nothing,’ and he said, ‘You want to go to Selma?’ and I said, ‘Sure, man. Thanks for asking me.’ [Then at the march, police] dogs were biting, and people were being bombed, and it was like, ‘Where are we?”

After being prevented by the authorities from reaching their final destination of Montgomery in two previous marches, the civil-rights campaigners finally arrived in the Alabama state capital on March 25, 1965.

The civil-rights march from Selma to Montgomery, led by Martin Luther King Jr. 1965 © The Dennis Hopper Trust.

The civil-rights march from Selma to Montgomery, led by Martin Luther King Jr. 1965 © The Dennis Hopper Trust.

The civil-rights march from Selma to Montgomery, led by Martin Luther King Jr. 1965 © The Dennis Hopper Trust.

The civil-rights march from Selma to Montgomery, led by Martin Luther King Jr. 1965 © The Dennis Hopper Trust.

Selma, Alabama (U.S. Historians). Includes renowned African-American historian John Hope Franklinwith scholars John William Higham and William E. Leuchtenburg. They march under a sign identifying their group. © The Dennis Hopper Trust.

Dennis Hopper, Selma, Alabama (Full Employment), 1965 © The Dennis Hopper Trust.

Martin Luther King Jr.’s close friend and collaborator Ralph David Abernathy (at the podium) © The Dennis Hopper Trust.

Dennis Hopper, Martin Luther King Jr., 1965 © The Dennis Hopper Trust

By 1971, following the success of Easy Rider, Hopper was bankrolled by Universal with $850,000 and given total creative reign to produce whatever he wanted. His 2010 obituary in The Guardian makes for colourful reading:

“He moved to Peru with a cast and crew for a self-penned, directed and edited meta-monstrosity, The Last Movie (1971). The film starred Hopper as a stuntman with a Christ complex on the set of a western being directed by Samuel Fuller, the film, made for the stoned by the stoned, was stoned by the critics.

His eight-year marriage to Brooke Hayward, the daughter of actor Margaret Sullavan, had meanwhile ended in divorce. In 1970, he married Michelle Phillips, of the Mamas & the Papas -  it lasted eight days. (“The first seven days were pretty good,” Hopper once commented.) In the same year, a raving, naked, drug-fuelled Hopper was arrested while running around Los Alamos, New Mexico.

Before The Last Movie’s release, Hopper wrote and appeared in an autobiographical documentary, The American Dreamer (1971), which showed him editing The Last Movie at his home in Taos, New Mexico, spouting hippy philosophy, taking baths with women and shooting guns. In the same year, a raving, naked, drug-fuelled Hopper was arrested while running around Los Alamos, New Mexico. This sealed his reputation as the most flipped-out man in the movies, and he spent the next 15 years in foreign films, personal projects, and low-budget arthouse or exploitation movies.”

But his photos remain a tribute to Hopper’s lucid eye, brilliantly capturing the moods behind the moments. He is today also remembered as an accomplished painter and sculptor, and a well-connected personality on the American art scene.

“I didn’t use a light meter; I just read the light off my hands. So the light varies, and there are some dark images. Also, I’m sort of a nervous person with the camera, so I will just shoot arbitrarily until I can focus and compose something, and then I make a shot. So generally, in those proof sheets, there are only three or four really concentrated efforts to take a photograph. It’s not like a professional kind of person who sets it up so every photograph looks really cool.” (Dennis Hopper).

Shortly before Hopper passed away in 2010, Viggo Mortensen called his friend of 20 years “a complete and fertile artist” who was “a constant source of ideas, inspiration and humour for his friends and colleagues”. Since his death Hopper’s photos have been exhibited extensively around the world, and his work beautifully presented in Taschen’s ‘Dennis Hopper: Photographs 1961-1967′

Dennis Hopper, Double Standard, 1961 © The Dennis Hopper Trust

Dennis Hopper, Bill Cosby (Map to the Stars), 1965 © The Hopper Trust


Biker Couple (image was also used as the cover for The Smith's...Best) 1961 © Dennis Hopper

Bikers, 1961 © Dennis Hopper

Dennis Hopper, Paul Newman, 1964 © The Dennis Hopper Trust

News is Daily Again, 1963 © The Dennis Hopper Trust

Tuesday Weld, 1965 © The Dennis Hopper Trust

Dennis Hopper, Edward Ruscha © The Dennis Hopper Trust

Jane Fonda (with bow and arrow), 1965. via Photographs 1961-1967 (Taschen)/2011 The Dennis Hopper Trust

Jane Fonda (with bow and arrow), 1965. via Photographs 1961-1967 (Taschen)/2011 The Dennis Hopper Trust

Brian Jones, 1965 © Dennis Hopper

Robert Fraser in Tijuana, Mexico, 1965 © The Dennis Hopper Trust

Wallace Berman, 1964 © The Dennis Hopper Trust

Self-portrait at porn stand, 1962, © Dennis Hopper


By Geoff Stanton

“They called John Cassavetes a cinema-verite director in one of the obituaries. That’s French for ‘the cinema of truth’, the kind of documentary film-making where the director stands back and doesn’t interfere, while things happen naturally. John Cassavetes never made a cinema verite film in his life. He was always in there up to his neck, swimming against life and shouting instructions to those in his wake. But don’t take that as a criticism. Cassavetes made films that gloriously celebrated the untidiness of life, at a time when everybody else was making  neat, slick formula pictures.” (Roger Ebert, ‘Awake in the Dark’ 1989)

“He deliberately tried to keep you off-balance, so you wouldn’t bring out old-fashioned technique and old ideas” said Peter Falk. “But it was impossible. I didn’t understand him. I wanted to strangle him.”  In 1970 the volatile friendship of Peter Falk and John Cassavetes yielded Husbands; criticised – by Ebert amongst others – for rambling scenes, chaotic turns, infantile meandering. Fair enough. But the story of male friendship remains genuine and true to form – a testament to the friendship that actually broke through the sweat-session improvisations and, for Falk and Cassavetes, endured through to the director’s death.

Pitched against Cassavetes’ creative momentum, Falk’s quiet instinct was not far from Columbo’s own shrewd intellect – the eternal TV detective to whom the great actor remains spliced. But his work with Cassavetes thoroughly wrenched the man from the mac. “There was no character” he later later admitted. “There was me.”

“You never knew when the camera might be going. And it was never ‘Stop. Cut. Start again.’ John would walk in the middle of a scene and talk, and though you didn’t realize it, the camera kept going. So I never knew what the hell he was doing. But he ultimately made me, and I think every actor, less self-conscious, less aware of the camera than anybody I’ve ever worked with.”

Cassavetes’ work was usually about the personal politics of strain; women go mad (or start off mad), men stay lost, dark, rebellious. His story pitch is bare, ripe with alienation and anger. Husbands was the story of three friends – Falk, Cassavetes and Gazzara – fast approaching forty, angrily aging in a fuel of alcohol and frustration, yearning for the freedom and the strength of youth. After a funeral of a friend they go on a bender that takes them as far as London and almost beyond return.

But Falk’s introduction to the idea actually began en-route for a hot dog. Recognising Cassavetes at an LA Lakers game, they began talking respective projects. Cassavetes’ contempt for the Hollywood system was clear – he impulsively agreed to work on Falk’s project because he respected his previous work, refusing to listen to an obligatory pitch. Cassavetes also had an idea about three old friends who went on an epic drinking binge after the death of a friend – he thought Falk would be perfect for a role.

Brother, can you spare a dime? Peter Falk, John Cassavetes and Ben Gazzara at the bar, working those extras. 1969.

Starting out as a live television star of the 1950s before leading an actors workshop when he made the acclaimed Shadows, Cassavetes had long turned his back on Hollywood and become an outsider. He pitted himself against the system, struggling to finance and distributing his own films at a time when getting a non-studio film into theaters was virtually impossible.

Peter Falk, by contrast, had started with a master’s degree in public administration and worked as an efficiency expert before deciding to take a chance on an acting career. Despite being remembered for Columbo, he had two Oscar nominations for Best Supporting Actor in 1960 and 1961—for his roles in Murder, Inc. and A Pocketful of Miracles.

'There are phases in everyone's life that are extreme' said Cassavetes, 'when emotions are heightened'. John Cassavetes, Ben Gazzara and Peter Falk mid-sweat session mode, 1969 © Time & Life images

“Because we keep forgetting that we’re in a bad situation – that’s what make it seem terrific” explains Cassavetes to Falk and Gazzara at one of their intensive work-shops, where they comb through the bar scene in countless ways. The story interested Cassavetes less than the “unguarded moments” he could catch on film, and in many ways the sweat sessions would trace the heat necessary to prep them.

“The only good part about the story was that it served as a basis for us to use for our individual expressions” said Cassavetes. “Actors will put their money where their mouth is, and directors won’t – that’s what it boils down to in my book.”

The alchemy of amateur and professional actors – with some performances from extras that Cassavetes claimed ‘are better than professional actors’ – produced a long, but innovative and genuine film that left Falk (who reportedly even got mugged for real while filming in New York) recharged, invigorated and slightly beweildered. “I had no idea what Husbands was about” he admitted after the shoot was through. “After it, I told him, ‘I’ll work with you as an actor, but not as a director’”.

John Cassavetes, 1969

Peter Falk and Ben Gazzara. Improvising or not? You decide. 1969

A scene that may have come straight from a Husbands improv featured on The Dick Cavett Show, where Falk, Cassavetes and Gazarra were invited to talk about the film. The three emerge comfortably scotched and in a cloud of cigarette smoke. True to form, Falk tries to give a serious pitch several times before being interrupted by a dancing Ben Gazarra, a commercial break and an unexpected swizzle upon Cassavetes’ shoulders.

Sony, not sure what to do with it all, labelled the film “a comedy about life, death, and freedom.”  Cassavetes meanwhile had to cut it by an hour and a half to get it down to contractual length. Columbia, the studio that produced the film, cut another eleven minutes off it anyway following some negative reviews and audience walkouts.

But the film was also praised for its innovation and genuine sense of camaraderie. Life Magazine featured the three friends – John Cassavetes, Ben Gazzara, and Peter Falk – as its cover story in May.  And the friendships endured. Cassavetes subsequently directed Falk on A Woman Under The Influence, regarded as his masterpiece, and the lesser lauded gangster flick Mikey and Nicky. He also appeared with Falk on Columbo.

“Can you recognise a difference between real sentiment, and sentimentality?” Falk ultimately challenged Dick Cavett’s audience. “We made a picture that doesn’t have any sentimentality in it. But has a great deal of feeling in it. It has the kind of emotions that we all experience, but you really don’t see on the screen. The kind of emotions that get lost – but they’re no longer contrived in our film. They’re genuine. Delight, hope, irritation, frustration, anger, friendship, love. Beweilderment, confusion. They’re all there. Go see it.’

Falk may well have agreed with Roger Ebert when he said “I met Cassavetes a few times and then I understood his films in a better way. They were like he was. Now that he is gone his films will have to speak for him, and few directors have left behind work that duplicates more exactly the pleasure of being in their company”.



John Cassavetes, Peter Falk, Elke Krivat, Ben Gazzara at the 1982 marriage of Krivat and Gazzara, © Time & Life images.

John Cassavetes, Elke Krivat, Ben Gazzara, and Peter Falk, at the 1982 marriage of Krivat and Gazzara, © Time & Life images.

John Cassavetes, Elke Krivat and Peter Falk © Time & Life images.

‘Stone’ 1974. The Grave Diggers, lead and directed by The Undertaker (Sandy Harbutt) – gun in hand.


By Geoff Stanton

When Sandy Harbutt’s biker classic Stone rumbled through cinemas in 1974 few would have thought the trail would still be smoking in 2011.  But Stone’s five-gallon metamorphose of counter-culture, violence and motorcycles remains as pioneering as ever. Since 1974 Stone has galvanized a worldwide fan base, spawned motorcycle clubs such as The Vietnam Veterans (who now proudly wear the actual Grave Diggers crest across their backs) and horrified the critics.

But the world has turned since 1974. When I spoke to writer and film maker Richard Cartwright in 2010, he could attest to this. He was in fact preparing to ‘take the trip’ again and begin shooting a reworking of the iconic Aussie flick – in 3D and with a new generation of bikers.  “I am actually using the word recreation or reinvention,” he enthused. “I think some pieces of art you just don’t touch. And I think I will refer to Mr Quentin Tarantino’s line, which is that ‘Stone is just too good to remake’. This will be more of a homage”.

Dr Death (Vincent Gil) and friends relax over beer and speedballs.

Harbutt’s 1974 Stone – about an undercover cop thrown into a bikie group while trailing unsolved murders – transcends its obligatory plot to capture a vital pulse. It champions a lifestyle, a creed that challenges the establishment, charts its own moral ground, finds freedom in volatility. It is possibly satanic, definitely violent, and has a great rock n roll soundtrack. In other words, the original Stone remains as relevant as ever.

Developing the material for the 21st century was itself proving to be challenging. “The bike clubs of 1974 are not quite what they are today,” conceded Cartwright. “So there’s an element of looking at the biker legacy. I’ll also be bringing back into the script some of the original characters from 1974. The Undertaker will be reprised, as well as a couple of the other characters from the original gang. They will be older versions. They will ride into town and say ‘Hey, what the hell’s going on here?’”.


Cartwright’s approach was not so different from Harbutt’s vision. Which is fortunate, as Stone’s creator remains unwaveringly loyal to his inspirations. “You have to have a dynamic subject to make a movie in Australia that anybody is going to go and see,” Harbutt told me. “I was a motorcyclist, I’d been riding my Triumph around for a while and I had a real interest in those types of people – and the Vietnam War was on. I thought the ideal outlaw motorcycle gang would be a group of returned Vietnam veterans who had every reason to reject the current corrupt society.

“There was a lot of reason to be angry. In fact, when I was raising the money for the film I actually had to lie – until I got the money they were called The Grave Robbers rather than the Grave Diggers. Simply because it was just so controversial. And the people who had the money were the Establishment”.

Payday for the Grave Diggers

Since wrangling his film into existence Harbutt has himself kept a low profile. But the myths surrounding Stone – which confounded critics by becoming one of Australia’s most successful film ventures – have thrived. Witness Stone‘s legendary budget of beer and dope. Or the violent brawl scene outside the pub, featuring brigades of enlisted bikers who pummeled, jackknifed and beat cast members out of pulpy character and into unscripted reality. Before being paid in beer and dope.

Not entirely so says Harbutt, bringing it back down to earth.

“These stories just get a little out of hand really” he tells me, discussing the brawl scene. “What we did was invited people to come, and they came. They all took part – not including the Hell’s Angels, who didn’t take part in any of the fighting. I’m too smart for that… The fight was completely choreographed by Peter Armstrong, and the non professional guys… well, part of Peter’s skill was that he could stage huge fights like that and people would think it was for real. Peter was such a great stunt choreographer, as well as being the best stunt man in the world. But yeah, so that was completely choreographed. The only thing that wasn’t choreographed was the arrival of the Black Hawks, when the guy falls off the bike and onto his face. And then after that, basically what we did was told the guys that over the next hill was a pub called The Dry Dock and we had free beer.”

“So basically we paid for the bar, and everyone went over there and got drunk and went home. We didn’t actually say if they came we’d pay them in beer. Even though some of them were drinking while it was going on we certainly didn’t want people to be drunk while they were doing what they were doing. It was just guys having a bit of a drink on a Saturday afternoon. The whole cast and crew were always paid professionally. But then, once we invited people to come for the funeral scene – 400 turned up. All we paid was their dole. The other thing was, as for paying the Hells Angels in dope – they didn’t actually smoke dope in those days. That came along a bit later.”

Dr Death (Vincent Gil) and friend with chilum.

Amanda (Helen Morse) with spliff.

Stoned. The Undertaker (Sandy Harbutt) with Stone (Ken Shorter) and... friend.

It is no secret that Tarantino is a big fan of Stone. Cartwright and the inimitable QT shared their enthusiasm at Cannes, where Cartwright was lucky enough to gain an audience with the director.  “I met with Tarantino and his exact words to me were: “Sandy Harbutt – that guy is a visionary!”. Cartwright meanwhile gave Tarantino an original 35mm print from Harbutt’s own collection.  “Tarantino’s face was like a five year old kid in a candy store! The film was in an authentic 1974 can, slightly rusted, with Goulburn Theatre and Darwin Cinema stamps all over it”. The possibility remains open that Tarantino may play a role in proceedings, although Cartwright admitted at the time that he was not precious about the capacity in which Tarantino would be involved.

Most importantly, however, Harbutt had given the project his blessing. “One thing I will say is that Sandy has not imposed his point of view at any given time. He has made some wonderful and helpful suggestions. Sandy has said to me ‘Richard, I’ve made my film – now go and make your film”. And I think that was a wonderful thing to say. And I couldn’t be more humble. It is now my goal to do justice to Sandy’s great piece of iconic Australian cinema”.

By Geoff Stanton

 

When Mick Jagger set stirrup for the lead role in 1969’s Ned Kelly, history was meant to bear him somewhere between Billy the Kid and a ballsy Irish folk song. “The more I worked on it the more I thought I could make it by adopting a ballad, almost country and western formula” recounted Tony Richardson, the flamboyant British director behind such celebrated epics as The Charge of the Light Brigade and Tom Jones (and father of the late actress Natasha Richardson). But while the cinematography would unfurl with beautifully haunting reverie, any romantic re-imagining was swiftly ringbarked by the dramas of rock stardom, careless rewrites and worst of all (according to Richardson) – Australians. Ned Kelly is indeed a renowned tale of thuggery, violence and an indomitable mythology – and that was just behind the camera.

 
Jagger and the Iron Outlaw

“Ned Kelly?” reminisced a skull-jewelled Keith Richards to FILMINK in 2008. “With that bucket on the head!? I said, ‘Don’t do it, Mick!’. Mick’s not natural cinema food. But what he does in his spare time is up to him.”

“Having gone for Mick I should have made a very different film” conceded Richardson years later in his autobiography Long Distance Runner. “Maybe a kind of collage that capitalised on the striking contrasts of his talent, instead of trying to push Mick into being an incipient John Wayne.”

But if there is anyone who can authoritatively recount the curious left-bend Kelly took, it is veteran Australian screenwriter Ian Jones. Whilst helming legendary production company Crawfords as writer, producer and director (where he pioneered Homicide, Hunter and Division Four) Jones began helping Richardson draft the original script for Ned Kelly. Jones was (and also remains) a leading Kelly tragic and authority. Indeed, much of his interest in the dynamic between crime and authority sprang from this devotional source.

“When I was about ten I read The Complete History of the Kelly Gang, in which he was a Robin Hood figure” recounts Jones. “Then I read The True Story of the Kelly Gang, in which Ned was the villain and the police were the heroes. I realised that if I wanted to know the true story of the Kelly Gang I’d have to find it out for myself.” By the time Jones was twelve he was going through newspaper files, and by fifteen he had started going through the minutes of the Kelly Royal Commission.  By the 1950s this had inevitably lead to an amateur Kelly film.  “I spent two hundred pounds to get two hundred feet of film.” After wrangling paddle-steamers and coaches for the project was aborted midway after Jones stepped a broken bottle in a billabong. “One hundred and fifty feet and that was it – a pretty disastrous exercise”.

But it would take more than that to ultimately deter him. “At Crawfords we were actually talking about making a Ned Kelly film shortly before Tony Richardson arrived in Australia in 1968. It was a god-send to suddenly get a phone call asking me to arrange lunch with Tony Richardson to talk about making a Kelly film. We were gearing up to do Division Four, having got Homicide on the rails and Hunter – so I could only be loaned for 3 weeks. I arrived in London on New Years Eve 1968 and began working with Tony on New Years Day 1969.”

The journey began well. Richardson met Jones to begin work on the script with a flute of Moet Chandon in hand. “And a silver swizzle stick to keep it lively!” laughs Jones. “He had a bit of a hangover. He was an amazing man – incredibly flamboyant. He had a script already written, and I can’t remember who wrote it, but I remember Tony saying “I don’t want to make a film about a caveman who wants to wear a helmet!”.

 

Casting the Helmet

It is ironic that Kelly’s legend was borne from a desperate desire to be left alone. There are at least twelve films to leave the iron outlaw swinging. But between knocks Ned has roused a genre. The Story of the Kelly Gang (1906) (flagged as the world’s first feature) and 2003s Ned Kelly (starring Heath Ledger) bracket dozens of films (including Captain Midnight, King of the Road, Captain Starlight) that consistently ignite interest, but never the depth of passion Kelly lore evokes.

The original Ned Kelly, 1880

Ian Jones recognised the opportunity to show Kelly as he really was – a wily, charismatic Irishman. He was initially pleased that Richardson appeared to share the same view.  “Tony saw a lot of poetry in Ned and thought, as I did, that the Irish roots were very, very important and that Ned should speak and think with an Irish accent. This was revolutionary at the time. Ned was always archetypically Australian. Think of an AFL footballer with an Australian accent – typified by Bob Chitty in The Glenrowan Affair (1951).”

Casting threw a seasoned assortment of names into the mix. “At that stage it was a Columbian film, and they were coming up with names like Sean Connery, Peter O’Toole, Richard Harris and Warren Beatty” recounts Jones. “Ian McKellen had also recently done Richard II and Tony was very impressed – so we gave him a bit of the Jerilderie letter (Kelly’s famous letter and manifesto) and filmed him in costume with some stubble in a stable somewhere – and he really gave a very very powerful Ned.”

But he could not have guessed where the tin hat would land. “There were a couple of little flashes of danger early in the piece though,” he ruminates. “Tony said ‘Ian, when you think of Ned Kelly what do you see?’. I said ‘I see a big bearded man sitting on a horse’. And Tony said ‘Ah! But the fact that he was big isn’t important! It is no more important than the colour of his hair!’”. I should have hammered home the point that part of Ned’s tragedy was that he was such an indomitable figure. To me that was an inescapable part of his tragedy. He could not escape attention. He could not avoid being drawn into a fight.”

The strutting quaver of a willowy frontman was clearly not on Jones’ list of candidates. “‘Mick Jagger!?’ I said. Tony said excitedly ‘Oh, do you know him?’.  I said ‘No, Tony!!’. And he said “Well, have you ever seen him act? He’s maaarvelous!’ I said ‘But Tony, he’s not exactly a big man, is he?’ Tony said “Christ no! He’s the smallest fucking man you’ve ever seen! But he’s got a very big head!!’”

                               Ned Kelly, 1969. Image by © Robert Whitaker     via

“I had tested some very good actors,” reminisced Richardson. “And Mick was suggested. Mick was sniffing at a career as an actor. I’d always been a fan of the Stones and was excited by the prospect. The wicked battered Irish face was perfect for Ned. We discussed the problems the role would present in terms of its physical demands. He would have to handle horses and guns. He was sure it was only a question of practice, and, astonished by his magnetism, energy and freedom on stage, I persuaded myself that there was a way his body, with the speed of an urban street cobra, could be transformed into that of an outdoor bushman. It was a mistake.”
With casting misadventure now in the wings, Richardson was also about to pass through his antipodean Ninth Gate.

 
A Mysterious and Unsympathetic Land

“The most striking impression (of Australia) was the monotony of the ubiquitous eucalyptus trees, broken only where the forests had been ring barked and burnt, the result like great black scars on the dull green land” wrote Richardson. “While Sydney seemed to combine the worst elements of Glasgow and San Francisco”.

“Tony didn’t like Australia.” says Jones. “None of the British crew did. I mean, it was a terribly tough shoot. And the English unions kicked up like hell about the number of Australians Tony was using. They virtually called a strike towards the end of filming and sent telegrams to the members of crew. Tony held them until the film was finished,” laughs Jones “which was a fairly Tony way of doing things”.

Richardson flew to Queensland for an initial recce.  “Social activity for the whole district, an area of probably 1000 square miles, was centred on one bar from four o’clock in the afternoon. There was a tiny band who bawled dirty lyrics, to the roars and leers of the clientele, who poured down beer after beer until they went outside to throw up and then returned to the bar. There was nothing to do except drink. Finally I found (our host’s friends) – they’d picked up two nurses, and their VW was already packed but somehow we sandwiched in. They hurtled off at about 120 mph. Kangaroos leaped across the road and the brothers whooped and gunned forward trying to hit the animals. When we finally got back the girls were told to “fuck off home” – another 100 miles away. We set out to devour all that remained in the freezer – frozen French fries.”

A ‘man of wealth and taste’ was on his way, however. For Jagger it had been one hell of a year. While The Rolling Stones were at the top of their game, dishing out raw-knuckle soundtracks synonymous with sixties decline, heroin was setting cracks in the edifice; Richards had been arrested for drug possession, Brian Jones was dead and Jagger’s sidekick Marianne Faithfull – now cast alongside Jagger as Kelly’s sister Maggie – was in the grip of withdrawal and frail as a leaf.  After the famous memorial gig for Jones in Hyde Park, Jagger and Faithfull skipped the funeral straight for Australia. Jagger initially seized hungrily upon the role. After starring as a self-absorbed rock star in Nic Roeg’s cult film Performance – perhaps an echo of his own spook – cinema had become another professional paramour. But Kelly was to be a different creature.

“I’ve never done many parts, only one really; and this isn’t as difficult” reasoned Jagger initially. “I’m playing someone very different from myself so it’s much easier going. It won’t look like anything like me, with hips swinging and so on. I will look very Victorian. As far as the role’s concerned, I’m taking it very seriously. It’s not a joke, otherwise it’d be a bad movie.”
“Will it be hard with Marianne Faithfull playing your sister?” quipped one reporter.
“No” retorted Jagger.  “I’ve always wanted an incestuous relationship.”

Daily Mail's image of Mick Jagger and Marianne Faithfull after fronting court over the drug bust, 1969.

Australian media had not lapped at rock dignitary this thoroughly since The Beatles tour of ‘63. For publicity it was a major coup. But for Jones it was having a profounder effect. “The notoriety of the Rolling Stones was a hell of a hurdle. Not helped by the fact that Marianne Faithful was about to have a disastrous drug overdose upon arriving in Australia”. Faithfull had been “fatigued” by the journey, the press conference was told, and was now resting. She had in fact swallowed one hundred and fifty barbiturate tablets and was now within a tailcoat of Brian Jones. Journalists were soon wise.

“The Australian press behaved like a ravening pack of hunting-dogs” recalled Richardson. “The hotel where we were staying had to have massive security to prevent them breaking into Mick’s suite. There had to be massive security at the intensive care ward. The security was eventually broken by a pressman who disguised himself in a white coat as an intern. Escaping when discovered, he managed to knock over the IV equipment of a dozen dying patients. Nevertheless, in triumph, one of the papers boasted its scoop – a huge front page out-of-focus photo of an unrecognisable Marianne with blurred tubes in her mouth and nostrils.”

“That rock n’ roll image was already being reinforced” says Jones. Columbia had already dropped their support following the casting decision. “But fortunately the character of Maggie wasn’t going to be used for some time and the lovely Australian actress Diane Craig swung in – and played the role beautifully.”

 

Welcome to Kelly Country

With lurid dramas percolating the fringe, other aspects came together extremely well. In terms of viscerally creating Kelly’s rustic world the film succeeds beautifully.  “Jocelyn Herbert (the designer) was absolutely wonderful. She trod the tightrope between Mick as Ned Kelly and Mick as a pop figure. The interesting thing was that flares were in, and flares were also very big during the Kelly period. Putting him in flares was really quite accurate – although giving him a sort of lacey affair to rob the banks in was possibly going a bit far.”

“Jocelyn’s Kelly homestead was an awesome creation. Tony had found this old site way out somewhere near Braidwood that was virtually just a chimney, so he decided this was where he wanted to film because this was where people had lived and died – had children and suffered. Jocelyn borrowed slabs from around the place to build the Kelly homestead. It was perfect. When I arrived there I thought ‘how did they get this slab hut intact like this – this is amazing!’ When I went inside I was still fooled. I thought Good Lord – it’s still got newspapers on the walls! I glanced at the newspapers and noticed there was an evening Ballina Standard and a Murray Advertiser – she’d had newspapers specially printed and then aged them. The calico ceiling looked like it had been there forever. It was astonishing. We were just a couple of hundred feet from the snow line, it was the middle of winter and it was freezing, so we had a blazing fire going the whole time”.

The Kelly homestead by Robert Whitaker, 1969

The silky landscape was conjured masterfully by Australian cinematographer Gerry Fisher.  “It had a wonderful feel of the past about it,” says Jones. “It was an absolutely revelationary vision of Australian landscape. It was shot in winter, and that helped to capture the Irish mood of the story. Fisher used antique Ross lenses on the film, all of which added up to a terrific physical impact.”

The old Melbourne jail where Kelly was actually hanged was also given a make-over, with gallows rehinged and a prop beam put in. “A lot of the props are still there actually” says Jones. “The door, the trap and the beam are still there from the film. It was also the first time I saw Mick. It was his first day of filming. I said g’day to Tony, and then on cue, out of a cell half way down the gallery, came the execution procession – including Mick with a beard but no moustache. I said to Tony ‘Why hasn’t Ned got a moustache?’ Tony said ‘We tried several moustaches – but they all looked too weak!’ So that was it. We had Mick with those amazing lips blazing from his face and this trim beard, which, if anything, accentuated his trademark lips”.

 

The Wild Colonial Stone

Jones admired Jagger, but knew the weight of celebrity couldn’t hold the film’s centre. “I think Mick unbalanced the thing, and that’s the pity of it. For all the value of casting someone his age and playing him with an Irish accent it is inescapable. It revolves around Mick Jagger and everything that he was. It was almost impossible not to be conscious of the fact that you were looking at Mick Jagger.”

Promotional shot of Mick Jagger as Ned Kelly, 1969

“Though fire and energy snake out of Mick like electricity in concert, he can’t produce them cold as an actor” admitted Richardson later. “It’s a problem with many rock performers. Another problem is that great artists – singers, dancers, sportsmen – don’t carry their public with them when they cross over into a different, often alien, situation. The face was great, but the body seemed frail – at times spastic. But the mistake was mine.”

While staying in a small grazing property thirty kilometres out of Canberra in Queanbeyan, Jagger worked hard at the role but was finding it demanding. “Mick did try for a while” said Richardson. “He rode, he shot guns, he learned how to improvise. But, for all his exceptional intelligence (I often thought he was far too intelligent to be an actor) and imagination, he couldn’t understand the dues he would have to pay to look at ease in the saddle – or maybe he just got bored. He couldn’t suspend himself and become a character. And probably if I’d tried to tailor the character more to him he’d have resisted it.”

“Tony had a remarkable intellect” says Jones. “He knew we were dealing with a young rebel of the 1870s. And Mick was a youth rebel of the 1960s – one hundred years later. But Mick is a very different sort of rebel from Ned. And the fact that Tony didn’t understand the central physicality of Ned’s nature in the destiny of Ned Kelly – that was a fatal flaw. I blame myself for not hammering it home more strongly. But Tony and Mick make a good fist of it, like that seminal twenty round bare-knuckle fight with Wild Wright – however incipiently ridiculous Mick looked in the outfit as a boxer. And the gunfight at Stringy Bark Creek. Tony could get very gritty. He captured the important aspects of Kelly – but in other ways Mick could never be Ned Kelly.”

Jagger and Richardson on set, by Robert Whitaker via

While Jagger was losing interest, the story itself also beelined it for the hills. “The story was starting to go all over the place” says Jones. “I had major problems with what was going on; Tony was doing the most bizarre things with the script! When I arrived in Braidwood for a few days and discovered some of the things Tony had done I threw a wobbly. I was actually meant to be in the film, but I said ‘I don’t want to know anything about it’ and marched off. Tony was absolutely incorrigible. He’d get an idea and suddenly improvise something. The scene where the gang accidentally burn their dinner and then jump and flap about in the water… it’s not the way bushman behave! That was all down to improvisation. Tony would rehearse a scene and then suddenly have an entirely different idea and do another take and print it. He would completely wing the whole thing.”

Jagger’s Irish dialogue coach had also started providing some of the dialogue while Richardson’s friend Jim Sharman (who went on to direct The Rocky Horror Picture Show) also began dabbling with the script. Eventually Australian playwright and author Alex Buzo also joined the party, eventually claiming the screenplay as his. “I thought it was very brave of him. I have always stressed that I wrote the first draft of the script, and this was all I’d admit to – even though Tony and I got the credit for the whole thing”.

In one rare turn though, the film admirably imitated myth when Jagger was actually shot.  “They were using authentic firearms” begins Jones. “I can’t remember if it was a revolver or a rifle – but one of the firearms had a lead adaptor inside it to take the blank. This adaptor was blown out and hit Mick in the hand while they were doing the last stand. He was literally shot. They wanted him to stay away and knock off for a few days, but he wouldn’t. In the end they got someone to pinch his clothes so he couldn’t come onto location. And that is why he wears gloves in several scenes. Because of the wound on his hand. He was a very gutsy fellow”. Mark McManus, who played young Kelly Gang member Joe Byrne, also narrowly escaped death when his horse-drawn cart overturned.

Let it Bleed. Mick in the helmet, image by Robert Whitaker via

It’s a shame Richardson couldn’t harness some of the mayhem and corral it into the film. The wrap party, for instance, rivalled the Last Stand. “Drunkenness was endemic in Australia,” commented Richardson. “One or two beers were enough to send anyone off in a violent and destructive way.” Richardson pre-emptively prepared for the party behind a ten-foot-tall barbed wire fence designed to protect the property. “During the shoot we rented a very beautiful 1820s sheep ranch near Bungendore, outside Canberra. With its cool wood-panelled rooms, it was too lovely to risk beer bottles flying at mouldings or into mirrors.”

The next morning people lay passed out and bleeding across shards of broken glass. “Not a single cup or glass or receptacle survived. Even so, we considered ourselves lucky, as a local gunning club whom we’d used in the film brought their 19th century cannon and tried to lob shells at the house – one of the few authentic period houses remaining and a famous landmark. This time the alcohol was on our side – their aim was off.”

 

Such is Life

“Ned Kelly was like having a still born child” said Richardson on the final film. “The shape and features were all there, but without a breath of life”.

“I was thrilled by some things and appalled by others” recounts Jones. “It wasn’t Ned as I knew him and it wasn’t the story as I had tried to tell it. Visually I thought it was superb and some moments which were unhistorical but worked quite well. Stringy Bark Creek was very well done. The Last Stand was beautifully handled. The railway cutting and the misty dawn theme – it was just terrific. A hell of a lot of work went into that. But it was very hard for me to be objective. There was enormous disappointment. It didn’t work as a piece of cinema as a whole. Even if I divorced all my conceptions of Ned the story was simply not well told.”

Reviewers were less circumspect. “When Jagger puts on his home-made armour he looks like a cut rate sardine” commented one. “About as lethal as last week’s lettuce”. Jagger himself boycotted the Premier. “I didn’t know the film was going to be shit” was his parting shot.

“I liked Mick” says Jones. “I found him a very honest sort of character. He was a very straightforward in his way. But he behaved very badly when he realised the film obviously wasn’t going to be a success. He just walked right away from it – ditched it. He ditched Tony, and Tony was quite hurt by that. Because Mick had become and absolute obsession with him”.

The film received praise from some surprising quarters however. “I was at the premier in the Glenrowan Hall and I sat next to Gwen Griffiths – who was related by marriage to the Kelly family and who had actually lived in the Kelly homestead. When the film was over I said ‘What did you think?’. And she said ‘I thought it was marvellous!’. So I said ‘What did you think of Mick?’ and she said ‘I couldn’t imagine anyone else in the role!’. She had grown up with people talking about ‘the boys’, the old timers always talked about ‘the boys’, and that was the gang. And they were boys. Ned was dead before he was 26. Dan and Steve were still teenagers. All the problems of the film were unimportant to her.”

Robert Whitaker's still of the final shoot out.

Jones maintains Ned Kelly has its place in the Kelly canon. “With historical drama you are walking a tightrope between authenticity and drama. The interface is very delicate. English writer Vera Brittain said the idea of historical fiction is to invent nothing but imagine everything. The same applies to film. That is the problem of having a historical vision of any character – it’s going to be subjective”.

History may show that Mick Jagger is more comfortable making it rather than retreading it. But he did leave his mark on the Kelly armour.  The initials MJ are still visible in the body-suit displayed at the Queanbeyan City Library. In the meantime, Richardson made a break from the colony by fleeing for the charms of India – where he subsequently spent time in a locked room after having his tea spiked with acid. It had been a hell of a journey from the silver swizzle stick. Jagger’s Kelly headpiece, meanwhile, has since been stolen.

Published in Filmink Magazine 2010



Published in Filmink Magazine 2010

In the late fifties Hollywood came to Melbourne in the form of producer/director Stanley Kramer’s haunting post apocalyptic classic ‘On The Beach’ starring Gregory Peck, Ava Gardner, Fred Astaire, Anthony Perkins and Donna Anderson. That collision is now the stuff of legend…

Geoff Stanton

It’s now fifty years since American filmmaker Stanley Kramer – a producer and director of note who would come to define the concept of social commentary in cinema, with credits like ‘The Defiant Ones’, ‘Judgement at Nuremburg’ and ‘Guess who’s coming to Dinner’ – arrived in Melbourne to film the big screen adaption of local novelist Nevile Shute’s ‘On The Beach’. Set in the shadowy aftermath of a nuclear war, the film locates the distant Australia as the planet’s last vestige of society.

With the rest of the world destroyed or dying, Australia will soon fall prey to the winds that carry lethal doses of nuclear fallout and radiation. Looking over the precipice into destruction, the population continues on in a kind of living eulogy, grimly aware of their collective and fast approaching fate. The powerful delivery of the film’s cautionary and apocalyptic tale was unprecedented. But the Melbourne based production of the film eventually became epic in its own right.

 Stanley Kramer directs extras out the front of the Melbourne State Library as the radiation cloud moves in. As published in Philip Davey’s ‘When Hollywood came to Melbourne’, from The Karen Sharpe Kramer Private Collection incorporating the Stanley Kramer Collection at UCLA (Los Angeles, California).


“When you see such a dire warning of apocalypse filmed in your own city with familiar every day surroundings it is extraordinarily close to the bone” says Philip Davey; historian, cinephile and On The Beach authority extraordinaire. Davey’s research has faithfully followed the footsteps of production, the ghost of Aussie Newsman Ted Madden (editor and publisher of News Weekly) his spiritual guide. American Director Stanley Kramer coaxed Madden into the engine room of Hollywood then inviting him along for the ride. “Kramer originally approached him to do a feature, and ended up inviting him to become part of the crew. Madden wrote a blow-by-blow description covering the 3 months. It must have been sensational.”

Kramer’s constellation of luminaries – Peck, Gardener (knuckle-swinging Sinatra in tow), Fred Astaire (in his first dramatic role), a young Anthony Perkins and starlet Donna Anderson – certainly alighted our shores with the bombast of a highball. The myths and folklore surrounding the convergence of two wildly different frontiers – and the hauntingly poignant film created – continues to fascinate. For Australia in particular the experience of Kramer’s masterpiece stands as rare vision.

 

 

Rum, Radiation and Death Sweats

It is one of the more lighthearted moments in the Pastoral Club as the city slowly winds down:
“How much of this Gould Campbell have we got left?” one old gent asks the barkeep.
“About four-hundred bottles, sir.”
“And in its prime. Shocking. Four-hundred bottles of vintage port in the cellars and barely five months to go. How can the club members be expected to get through four hundred bottles with five months to go?”
“I think it needs another year actually” replies the other gent, sipping on his port.

Gregory Peck, Ava Gardner and Fred Astaire on location at Canadian Bay, Melbourne. Photos by W.John Haysom, from the W. John Haysom Collection, La Trobe Picture Collection, State Library of Victoria.

Nevil Shute’s story is strikingly devoid of the violence and mayhem implicit in most post-apocalyptic neighbourhoods. In fact, in 2009 On The Beach could almost be a nostalgic portal onto an Australia of the 1950s. Ice tinkles about the clubhouses, pool cues clatter. Downtown shoppers in high heels and pillbox hats swarm about Flinders Street Station. People frolic at the beach and yacht races are skippered in the sun. Some critics were initially scathing of the denial inherent in the characterisations. Davey says this was a fundamental misunderstanding. “To me the story of a nuclear war without any obvious destruction or carnage or anarchy just made it more realistic. The idea that people are carrying on and planting a garden that will never come actually makes it more devastating.”

It was Donna Anderson’s first major role. She and Anthony Perkins play Mary and Peter Holmes – a young Australian couple with a newborn, striving to carry out daily rituals in the face of imminent doom. As the radiation cloud draws nearer their predicament becomes heartbreaking. Perkins is forced to decide whether to issue his young family the suicide pills or wait for the inevitable. The slow unravelling of routine turns the pitch from brooding ominous to near macabre. The wilting quaver of signage (“There Is Still Time…Brother”) in front of Melbourne’s State Library, and the ever-diminishing Salvation Army band beneath it, brilliantly convey the double-edged tone characterising this remarkable film.

Stanley Kramer directs Donna Anderson and Anthony Perkins.

Anderson vividly recalls her memories. “I had been under contract to Stanley Kramer for 3 years,” she tells Filmink. “He saw me in a dance show when I was 15 and signed me to a contract, and I continued my dance classes and studied with my drama coach Nina Moise. I had occasional meetings with Stanley for him to review my progress. At one meeting he mentioned he was going to do a film called On the Beach and he was thinking of casting Debbie Reynolds in one of the parts – or he might consider me for that role. The story was incredibly powerful – we truly believed it might happen. People were buying and building bomb shelters all across America. I believe it is as powerful today – an analogy of man’s relentless self-destruction.”

“Shute based his experiences on the Blitz in London” says Davey. “They got on with things regardless of the awful blitz and carnage. He wrote about good people who had something forced on them who had done absolutely nothing to deserve this”.

Kramer felt that it was a perfectly crafted expression. “Tension between the US and the Soviet Union was constant and ominous” commented Kramer later in his career, “Many people expected nuclear war to begin at any moment and end within half an hour. The world and everything in it is either dead or doomed to die”. Kramer had in fact acquired the rights for the book before it had even been published. Australia was to be the place where a final ensemble ruminate their loss. Living as an expatriate near Victoria’s Mornington Peninsula it was probably not an incredible flight of imagination for Shute to imagine the outside world had gone silent.

From this mute world family man Captain Dwight Towers (Peck) charters the Swordfish into Melbourne’s final pocket of humanity; where scientist Julian Osborne (Astaire) rues the stupidity of mankind, the garden of Mary and Peter Holmes (Anderson and Perkins) wilts before it has sprung and Moira (Ava Gardner) – former beau of Osborne, soon hopelessly hooked on Towers – drinks to forget.

Gregory Peck as Captain Dwight Towers. From The Karen Sharpe Kramer Private Collection incorporating the Stanley Kramer Collection at UCLA.(Los Angeles, California).

As Astaire immortally tells Perkins (after Perkins admits he has been trying to persuade his wife to kill herself and their baby): “I envy you. You have someone to worry about.”

If you’re going to make a film about the end of the world – Australia’s the place to do it

It was journalist Neil Jillett from the Sydney Sun who penned the controversial line famously attributed to Fiestress Ava Gardner. But, to be fair, it wasn’t wide of the mark. “You have to remember that for them at the time, it was being on the moon,” says Davey. “It was the other end of the universe”.

It was amongst the middling jostle of tramlines and churning pub belts that the Trojan behemoth of Hollywood wheeled its wares. At the time Melbourne was something of a backwater – barbells jangled for last drinks before 6pm, the meat pie with fish and chips provided cornerstones and the calendar hinged upon Cricket, footy and horse racing.

Donna Anderson remembers it fondly. “This was my first experience away from home and family and I found Melbourne fascinating. I seem to remember sheep running right down the middle of a city street! I loved all the fresh fish at from the small cafes. I was surprised at some of the whinging from colleagues longing for the easy comforts of home. I thought they were missing the adventure of this new experience. I also remember the different expressions like “I’ll ring you in the morning”. Tony and I assumed our driver meant he would telephone us, but he always ended up ringing the doorbell! I was treated so well by, but the celebrity part was sudden and strange. We had a lot of interviews. It was hard to figure anyone really wanting my opinion about anything.”

Hollywood heavyweight Gregory Peck agreed it was a story that needed to be told. He was also fascinated with the character of Dwight Towers – a man of duty who desperately missed his family. Peck saw many possibilities in this conflicted character and immediately began working on the script, sending incessant notes to Kramer. Casting the dance legend Fred Astaire as nuclear scientist Julian Osborne was, on the other hand, an inspired but risky choice for Kramer. It was one that would pay off. Astaire is a revelation.

Anderson: “I First I met Fred on the plane to Melbourne. He went out of his way to make me comfortable. Anxiety, and maybe the sleeper berths on the plane, caused me to have laryngitis so when we arrived in Sydney he did all the talking. Which was fine by me! We had a week of rehearsal and I met Tony at the studio. Tony was also staying at the Savoy Hotel. I was in a suite and he had taken a humble single room at the back. I was overwhelmed by all the space, especially after growing up and sharing a bed with my sister. Tony and I enjoyed sight-seeing Melbourne together – we ate constantly.”

From The Karen Sharpe Kramer Private Collection incorporating the Stanley Kramer Collection at UCLA.(Los Angeles, California).

Peck meanwhile stayed with his family in the lavish confines of the Kurneh estate in South Yarra. The sprawling house contained antiques formerly owned by Napoleon. “Gregory Peck seemed short on humour to me,” admits Anderson “although I spent very little time with him. But the cast and crew found his over-long pauses between his lines abundant material for good natured imitation.”

Gardner meanwhile had recently been released from a five-year contract with MGM and was keen to re-establish her career with a suitably powerful role. Her involvement was an exciting but potentially fraught venture. Aware of the signature tumult that followed Gardner, Kramer wrote a morals/penalty clause into her contract in which she could be dismissed for any indiscretion bringing the Stanley Kramer Corporation into disrepute. Following her rejected income-tax application, he also sent a legal team to Canberra to explain why the star’s involvement was in Australia’s economical interests.

From The Karen Sharpe Kramer Private Collection incorporating the Stanley Kramer Collection at UCLA.(Los Angeles, California).

Donna Anderson remembers Gardner fondly. “I didn’t spend much time with Ava either, but I did spend one looong night with her and one of our still photographers – bar hopping. She kept one bar open all night where I did a table dance, if I remember correctly, before going to her apartment where she made scrambled eggs. She suddenly wanted no more pictures taken and developed a change of attitude toward the photographer. She threw him out before breakfast after which I went back to the Savoy for much needed sleep.”

Ava Gardner fronts the crowds while at work. From The Karen Sharpe Kramer Private Collection incorporating the Stanley Kramer Collection at UCLA.(Los Angeles, California).

Not surprising, according to Davey. “The media treated Gardner appallingly. They’d be outside her flat at about five in the morning when she came out with her hair in rollers, ready to be made up on set. She had a clause in her contract that said all photos had to be vetted by her. But rags like The Truth would have people hiding in the Tea Trees at Canadian Bay taking distorted photos of her, so it’s little wonder that she reacted the way she did. She actually went to Sydney a few times to escape it all. But then again, it was there that she threw a glass of champagne over a reporter.”

Madden concurs: “I was particularly appalled by the attitude of some of my colleagues at the press conference Ava held at Essendon Airport. This is the one thing about this assignment so far that is getting under my skin.”

Tony Charlton, Kramer’s Australian Media Liaison Officer, (later celebrated sports commentator) recalled the press conference in Davey’s When Hollywood Came to Melbourne: “Ava stepped off the plane looking gorgeous and went into a less than pretentious VIP lounge. One of the first questions was “Are you still in love with Frank Sinatra?”, which nearly ended the press conference as Ava went bananas (Gardner had recently divorced Sinatra). It was then a difficult job trying to get her and the media together. She wouldn’t talk to anybody after that”.

Davey comments: “There was a pub where they were filming in Berwick, and the story goes that they were making these gin cocktails by the bucket load for her. But she was a consummate professional and never turned up drunk on set. She did her job and she was well liked by most of the team. It was just that the media got up her nose.”

Hollywood heavyweights – Ava Gardner and Fred Astaire. From The Karen Sharpe Kramer Private Collection incorporating the Stanley Kramer Collection at UCLA.(Los Angeles, California).

Gardner’s ruffled state-of-grace probably wasn’t aided by Frank Sinatra’s fleeting visit, in which he famously punched a journalist. Davey recalls: “Frank still had his attachment to her at the time, when he came to do his 1959 tour. I was actually chatting with Gardner’s chauffeur and he told me that he took her to the Chevron – which was where they had a bit of a big night that ended up in Frank decking one of the press. That was just before the show Sinatra did at Melbourne’s Festival Hall, which Ava followed him to. Sinatra said he wanted to dedicate a song to someone in the audience. The song was ‘The Lady is a Tramp’”.

Spectacle was clearly in the can well before any camera was mounted.

You mean to tell me this whole damn war was an accident?

The mammoth infiltration and mobilisation of Melbourne remains testament to Kramer’s tenacity. As he worked his way through echelons of authority he gradually roused not only the interest, but the support of institutes such as The Royal Australian Navy, The Victorian Railways, The Victorian Police and Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies.

Due to the grim anti-war sentiment of On The Beach’s, efforts at acquiring armed carriers, a nuclear submarine and naval officers from the US Navy had fallen unsurprisingly shy. Firstly, the US Navy told Kramer, he would have to get facts straight. If there were atomic apocalypse only 500 million would die – not the entire world. One of Kramer’s prime contacts in Australia was Victorian Promotions Committee member Don Chipp (who later founded The Australian Democrat Party). While showing Kramer about town Chipp introduced the director to a wide range of influences.

Peck relaxing in Canadian Bay. From The Karen Sharpe Kramer Private Collection incorporating the Stanley Kramer Collection at UCLA.(Los Angeles, California).

Prime Minister Menzies was at first reticent about helping Kramer. But he soon realized the value of having such a high profile film with Australia as the backdrop. “There is no doubt,” Menzies wrote to the Minister of the Navy “that some decent measure of co-operation is called for when a reputable company makes a reasonable request. If the company is prepared to meet all the Navy’s out of pocket I cannot see why full co-operation should not be extended.”

Kramer meanwhile succeeded in recreating the Swordfish using several gargantuan metal shells and a structure of plywood within the generous brackets of Melbourne’s Royal Showgrounds.

“Moving a Hollywood production to the backwater of Australia to produce a film of this quality was amazing,” says Davey. “At the time the Australian film industry was right down the toilet. There was no infrastructure, and Kramer had to bring most of the equipment in by ship. He also had to turn the Showgrounds into sound stages, which was almost a hopeless cause because of all the noise to contend with. You had an airport up the road, and a train station in the Showgrounds. And then there was the dog racing and trotting calls going on the entire time. By all accounts the sound guy was tearing his hair out.”

And there were other pressing problems. Despite screenwriter John Paxton’s faithfulness to the novel, the relationship with author Shute rapidly had hit an irredeemable low. Shute vehemently objected to the script’s insinuation that Towers and Moira become more than friends. But Kramer knew that he would be “lynched” by cinemagoers if he didn’t offer them something more emotionally substantial amid the gloom. Peck agreed. Meanwhile, Shute fought tooth and nail to regain control of the characters and reinvest them with moral fibre.

Kramer’s driver Robert Brown recalled Shute’s final meeting with Kramer at the author’s home in Langwarrin: “There was a hell of a blue. Kramer blew his top. I think it was the way Shute was talking.”

Says Davey: “Most people suggest that Shute was a very difficult man. Madden’s widow showed me an arch file of several hundred reams of notes – they suggest Shute never appeared on set because of his unfortunate relationship with Stanley Kramer.”

The Beach of Destruction

From a local perspective the groundswell of interest was unprecedented. “My father was actually working at the Showgrounds building phone boxes there, and one day he saw Fred Astaire” continues Davey. “Dad had grown up in the era of Fred and Ginger Rogers so he was completely blown away.”

One of the biggest problems soon became crowds of onlookers. Gregory Peck’s Personal Secretary drew a glimpse of madness in his diary: “The people here are most demonstrative when the personalities of Hollywood go anywhere. They applaud and cheer and practically tear the house down. It’s heart warming to see and hear but it can also be frightening at times. They have never had anything like this here, and the people are in a mad frenzy trying to get a glimpse of one of them.”

Peck and fans outside the Queen Victoria Memorial Hospital. From The Karen Sharpe Kramer Private Collection incorporating the Stanley Kramer Collection at UCLA.(Los Angeles, California).

“The experience had a kind of ‘other-worldliness’ to it,” says Anderson. “I was suddenly in a strange country and experiencing sudden celebrity. At first, rather than enjoying it, I found that it was kind of frightening. The only person I have seen that seemed to have accepted it with relish was Cary Grant. Fred Astaire seemed quite uncomfortable with the attention.”

One woman who skirted this nexus of stardom was Rena Pope (now Rena Grantham). Australian model, society figure and Chief Instructress at the Elly Lucas School of Elegance (charges included Olivia Newton-John in the 1970s) Grantham had been cast as an extra in the pivotal party scene alongside Peck, Gardner and Astaire. “Firstly, to be an extra in that movie at the time was like being a movie star today” says Grantham. “Melbourne had nothing in it at the time, and to be involved in a big movie like this with all these movie stars was fantastic. The atmosphere was electrifying.” Grantham found Gardner particularly enchanting. “She was beautiful, absolutely beautiful.”

Evidently so was Grantham. Within a day she was being courted by Astaire. “I remember Fred came and sat next to me and introduced himself. And I said ‘No need for introductions!’. He was very charismatic, but also very lonely. His wife had died and he was also worried that he would have to go back home to his daughter who was ill at the time. When sat next to me and said “What lovely soft hair you have”. I was taken aback. I said to him “your hair is very nice too”, and he leaned over and said “It’s a toupee!”. Gregory Peck saw him with me and he was very pleased to see Fred talking to somebody.

After enjoying several evenings dining with Fred Astaire at the salubrious Hotel Ciros, Astaire asked Grantham how she would feel about accompanying him back to the US. It was an offer she declined – but often wonders what fate may have had in store had she accepted.

Astaire and Perkins in the infamous club scene. Rena Grantham is to the right in the background. From The Karen Sharpe Kramer Private Collection incorporating the Stanley Kramer Collection at UCLA.(Los Angeles, California).

“I couldn’t go along with him to the US when he asked me. Unfortunately the Finishing School where I worked was my religion at the time, so I missed out on a lot, which I later regretted very much. But at the time I thought – what can you do? At least I was in one of the most important scenes of the film.” Grantham also recalls the gruelling shoot days. “At the time I thought ‘Goodness, is this how movies are made?’ It was very tiring and exhausting. For one whole day we were shooting a particular scene with Fred where he had to recite one particular line.”

Casting opportunities meanwhile provided a doorstop for a range of colourful Australian talent. Nancye Yeates, Director of The Australian Casting Agency in Melbourne, recalled: “One persistent, stout, grubby lady of about sixty, had a cardboard suitcase of ‘jewels’ for props. Another fellow, clearly disturbed, demanded an audition with Kramer. After being told for the second time Stanley was not holding auditions he pulled a knife and threatened to cut my throat. I talked him out of it on the basis that he would never get the role if he was jailed for murder”.

Last dance? Peck and Gardner. From The Karen Sharpe Kramer Private Collection incorporating the Stanley Kramer Collection at UCLA.(Los Angeles, California).

It was in a Kings Cross Bar in Sydney that Kramer met the more established spectrum of Australian TV, Film and Radio, including hard-edged theatre legends such as John Tate, Harp McGuire and Guy Doleman (Dangerous Summer, Shiralee and Thunderball). John Meillon, subsequent Aussie treasure in over forty-five films (continuing to haunt as the “hard earned thirst” voice for VB) was cast Peck’s Navy Ensign Ralph Swain.

The Swordfish makes a reconnaissance of a desolated US coastline. It is this breaking-point that eventually turns Towers into Moira’s arms and Swain into madness. Swain breaks from the submarine, swimming towards the radiation-soaked ghost-town of San Francisco. For contractual reasons this was doubled by Bill Hunter. Hunter went on to play Prime Minister in the dubious On The Beach 2000 (starring Bryan Brown and Rachel Ward. “Which was awful,” says Davey). Another cut scene featured a drunk Swain wrecking a bar. With Meillon on hand this was destined to be authentic. Six prop mirrors were set up. Meillon hurled his beer bottle. He smashed a real one. The set had to be rebuilt.

From The Karen Sharpe Kramer Private Collection incorporating the Stanley Kramer Collection at UCLA.(Los Angeles, California).

Grantham also remembers one scene featuring another iconic Aussie. The scene was later also cut – possibly because it was a little too light-hearted in tone. “It was a moment in the party scene where Gregory Peck lights my cigarette and everyone is dancing. Graham Kennedy was talked into coming along and he sat at the table near where Gregory and Ava dance, where everyone was having a good time”. Kennedy ended up chatting with Astaire about dancing, vaudeville and films.

The performances from the cast are remarkable. Peck’s immersion into his character contributes to one of the film’s most heart wrenching moments with Gardner, right on platform one of Frankston Station: “In the navy during the war” he struggles “I got used to the idea that … I might not make it. I got used to the idea of my wife and children being safe at home, no matter what. What I didn’t reckon on was in this kind of monstrous war something might happen to them and not to me. But it did. I can’t cope with it.”

The End is Nigh

Final word should rightfully go to Gardner, who claimed the ‘consummate’ kiss with Peck at the end of the film (following suicide pill handout and blackout of Melbourne) is one of cinema’s finest. “As I run towards him on the dock you can see our two profiles come together as the sun sets between our lips. It was a shot that everyone had said was impossible as the cinematographer was shooting straight into the sun. But he made it work. I personally think it is one of the greatest of all time.” A special filter was also to cast an iridescent hue of radiation around the 360-degree shot. Haunting images of deserted St Kilda Road and Swanston Street were filmed early one morning, a wind machine whirling their autumn leaves. The final shot of an empty city was shot from the top of the Carlton Brewery.

The film’s Premier was as sprawling as its production. Celebrities, dignitaries, and politicians participated in a co-ordinated screening with Peck in Moscow, Gardner in Rome, Astaire, Perkins and Kramer in LA. Shute stayed at home. Meanwhile, back in Australia, the Salvation Army actually counselled people disturbed by the film outside the cinema. Following the 50th anniversary interest in On The Beach remains a powerful classic with interest still riding high. It’s dark message, and the riveting story of a time when Hollywood met Melbourne, has meant it is sometimes regarded as a curio. But there is no doubting the message is as significant and relevant as ever.

With many thanks to Philip Davey. Images sourced from his book ‘When Hollywood came to Melbourne’. Please email me for any queries.

When ‘Wolf Creek’ was brought for over $4 million in 2005 by a US distributor, horror was quickly seen as the new vanguard of Australian cinema. But from what dark kernels does this inheritance stem? The history of the local horror film is cross-pollinated by various demands, from overseas audiences to distributing requirements to shoestring budgets. But the arcane total creates an interesting prism through which to gaze not just across a passage of Australian cinema, but into the heart of our somewhat darker preoccupations.

They lie somewhere between the murderous Datsuns of Peter Weir’s Cars that Ate Paris and the carnage of Terry Bourke’s 1971 slasher Night of Fear. This is a land dominated not by a vengeful God, but by ocker madmen and dark mystic edges. Its players drift lonely across the megafauna. The vast hollow of the outback provides a captivating stage for what horror author Robert Hood has called the “alien meaning that heralds a predetermined, apocalyptic end”.

Greg McLean acknowledged as much when he stepped onto the barren crater of the Wolf Creek location: “The implication is that there is some force in this place and it potentially manifests itself through dark, lonely characters who are thinking about things they shouldn’t be thinking about”.

For McLean Wolf Creek was a return to the ground zero of horror – tracing the legacy of films such as Texas Chainsaw Massacre and The Hills Have Eyes. “Whether you look at Wolf Creek as a crappy horror movie or as a thriller, it does focus you on an extremely uncomfortable moment and allows you to dwell on the darkest kind of human transaction you can imagine.” says McLean. ““Heads exploding is uninteresting by itself. There are so many crappy crime shows with killers and serial killers and they gloss over the unbelievable horror of the transaction at the moment of someone being killed.”

While Australia’s horror films may have been occasionally laconic (Incident at Ravens Gate), sometimes chilling (The Last Wave), frequently bizarre (Howling 3: The Marsupials) – they are all rooted in the sturdy disquiet and abhorrence that have stalked the land since colonial times and, more often than not, kept the Censorship Office open for business.

SOLDIERS OF THE CROSS (1900)


It may come as a surprise then that Australia’s first quasi-horror fest was pioneered by the Salvation Army. Limelight Productions was, in fact, one of the world’s very first production houses. Designed specifically as a recruiting tool, this department ultimately gained notoriety for a different reason. Soldiers of the Cross, a 1900 Limelight Production, was a skilful weaving of 200 beautiful limelight slides with 3000 feet of freshly pressed kinematographic film. It was also a brutal cavort through the fundaments of Sainthood. For two hours audiences watched Christian soldiers being shredded by lions in the wastes of the Coliseum; being beaten, crucified, mauled and beheaded before being turned into smouldering strips of human torchlight for the Emperor Nero. “The martyrdom of the saints is fascinating in its reality” commented one dazed parishner.

The show was a triumph

Soldiers of the Cross was just north of horror, but it cast its shadow. Within church ranks there was unease about this restless medium stirring on the horizon. The Church no doubt realised it had raised a golem. When the Salvation Army was taken over in 1910 by more puritanical commandants the film department was quickly dismantled. Full kudos must be given to the Army’s new insurgents: they clearly understood the genre’s potential.

THE BLOODY BUSHRANGER

Meanwhile, in lieu of burning saints, a mad parade of bushrangers, scoundrels and assorted villainy flocked to fill the breach. The Story of the Kelly Gang (1906), apocryphally noted as the world’s first full-length motion picture, retrieved the blood scent. A 1907 edition of the Bulletin says: “By the time the railway scene comes on the public have had their taste for blood so freely whetted they have no enthusiasm for the schoolmaster who spoils the Kelly arrangement”.

While the Bushranger does not strictly haunt Australia’s horror canon, he was critical to the development of its code. In the compendium of early bushranger films ferments the root note of the classic killer. While the mystic native has long belonged to the land (The Last Wave, Walkabout, The Dreaming), the madman has traditionally been the flip-sider who haunts the Big Australian Empty (along with powerhouse crocs and bristling hell-hogs).

It is no coincidence that this aspect of our heritage lent itself so supremely to the horror film and its (occasional) box office returns. By 1907 the bloody bushranger film was so popular one nettled preacher warned: “These films do for children all that strong drink does for the drunkard!” So when this high-calibre screen violence was banned from NSW cinemas in 1911 there was, naturally, an outcry. But this time it was the Government, not the Church, who pulled the curtain.

The famous postmortem of Joe Governor; minor celebrity and celebrated bushranger, a criminal whose violent exploits inspired a flourish of Australian "pictoral horror" - and hastened its censorship.

The banning of “pictorial horror” severely hampered the local industry, which had already found its niche in “representations of gore and galloping cut throats”, as one impassioned fan letter to the Bulletin put it. This protester suggested the reasons for the prohibition were disingenuous: “It is easier and cheaper to import the American gorescape than to make a local one. The puritan denounces the bushranger and hasn’t got a word to say against the Indian horror with the turkey’s tail around his savage cranium. Which showman is game enough to adopt the motto: ‘Only Australian Blood Spilt Here!’”

But it was to be more than seventy years before the bushranger was resurrected in such incarnate splendour as Phillipe Mora’s magnificently violent Mad Dog Morgan (also notable for the Dennis Hopper’s method-channelling of dead Irish bushrangers via a breakfast of rum and cocaine).  They also, in part, inspired the contemporary macabre of John Hillcoat’s excellent prison-based Ghosts of the Civil Dead, described by the UK Time Out Magazine as “presenting some of the most horrifying images ever shown on screen. A masterpiece in the order of Goya.”

Violence in Cinema: Part 1

The screen, like nature – and prohibition – abhors a vacuum. But for many years the Australian Film Industry languished in one. Over the next forty years Australia saw other moments of early on-screen horror, but they are sparse and few between.

By 1960 the Australian film industry had veered dangerously close to extinction. Between 1959 and 1966 not one Australian feature film, horror or otherwise, was produced. Amongst some more interesting documentaries, cinema reels were largely motion sound grabs lauding the British Empire, lyricising a golden age of prosperity. A generation of directors, writers and technicians practiced their art through the production of these newsreels. But the tightly sutured reality of post-war Australia was about to undergo a well-documented haemorrhage.

If there was a clearer reaction to this industrial film-mill than George Miller’s 1971 Violence in Cinema: Part 1, it is hard to find.  The film begins with a Professor (Arthur Dignam) seated at his desk, talking to camera about violence on screen. It comes as a shock then when a gunshot splits his head apart like pink fruit. Splattered in gore, Dignam rattles on, gabbling like a human metronome, while further desecrations commence to shear him down to bloodied pulp. The abhorrent sense of relief felt through this overt violence is palpable. The film was a short explosion; it tore a cavity open and exposed a heartbeat. The critics didn’t know what to do with it. At the 1972 Sydney Film Festival it was placed it in the documentary category.

THE HORROR PUSH

By the 1970s television had begun opening the eyes to the abominable. With political assassination buried in the collective conscience, Vietnam unfurling in the living room, and idealistic abandon exploding like a land mine at every step, what television couldn’t handle cinema dined on. In the US cinema screens were now luminous with gore. ‘Grindhouse Cinema’ was famously churning out its low-grade product. So when the new Whitlam Govt offered a subsidy to the Film Industry in 1970 we fixed our hands on grimier reels. By the mid seventies what Robert Hood calls the ‘Australian Horror Push’ was in full bludgeon.

Terry Bourke

“Horror films have suddenly become the best money making vehicle” Producer Rod Hay told the Daily Telegraph in 1973; “They also provided an excellent opportunity for technical excellence by photographers, make up artists and effects experts.”

Inspired by the gorier flicks now coming out of the US, Australia had its share of purveyors ready to dip their hand. The inimitable Terry Bourke was one. Bourke’s first feature had been a ‘soft-core sex romp’ set in Singapore, but after judiciously eyeing the US market he set to task creating a more salacious brand of outrage. Bourke teamed up with producer Rod Hay to form the Company Terryrod Productions, and together they conceived their first project.

Night of Fear was a homespun shocker – in the every sense of the word.  An inchoate story about a stranded woman stalked by a bush dwelling maniac, this low rent slasher was filmed in scrubland on the outskirts of Sydney, and drew heavily from elements of Herschell Lewis US-styled gore. It was rolling red with screams, rats and deliriously wide-eyed close ups.

Bourke’s Night of Fear had originally been intended as the pilot episode in a series called Fright, and for a while the concept had the press crowing: “Australia’s 4 Television Networks are scrambling to buy a locally made horror series featuring some of the most terrifying scenes ever filmed for television” bayed the Herald. But in 1973 the project was banned by censors on grounds of “extreme obscenity”.  Producer Rod Hay indignantly claimed it was yet another example of “victimisation of local product”. Although he did concede to the Mirror that the film was “horrific and bizarre and that children should not be allowed to see it.”

Having tossed Night of Fear among the pigeons, Bourke and Hay bravely followed up with their 1890’s fable Inn of the Damned; a gregarious mix of sex, carnage and a bit of Cobb & Co. history. The Grand Guignol gothic is set loose around the traps of an colonial Inn, but not helped by dialogue evidently dictated upon the slips of delirium. Yet the film’s indulgences are a frothy addition to that 1970s cocktail of terror – by today’s standards its conceits seem almost luxurious. Outlandish sex, violence and thuggery; all phrased in a sort of mismanaged opulence – the kind that beguiles but never quite bores. It is an intriguing work, shackled somewhere in the pantry of the greater gore masters. Bourke passed away in 2002 and while his work has also sunk into relative obscurity Night of Fear and Inn of the Damned can be found on DVD.

Peter Weir

It wasn't all about rats, rape and cannabalism. Or was it?

Others were meanwhile crafting different curios. The esoteric Picnic at Hanging Rock has virtually been touted as Australia’s answer to the Sistine Chapel.  But Weir’s lesser-celebrated visions lend some seriously black gravity to Australia’s horror heritage. The Last Wave, in which a lawyer involved in an Aboriginal murder case inadvertently discovers Sydney is to be obliterated by the ocean, is sheer apocalypse. It perfectly translates the eerie spiritualism of the outback to the blank canvas of the city. David Gulpilil is mesmerising as the aboriginal man haunting Richard Chamberlain’s head and slowly undoing his life. The film exudes disaster.

By contrast Weir’s surreal 1974 film The Cars that Ate Paris – about a car-obsessed town where locals slaughter passing motorists – is an absurd gem. It is set in a small NSW country town where doctors perform brain surgery on crash victims, turning them into ‘veggies’, while the rest of the community scavenge their car wrecks and cobble together the hybrid hot-rods that ultimately run riot in the blood fuelled finale. This was the first film to ever be funded by the Australian Film Development Corporation, and it made a good start of things by receiving acclaim at The Cannes Film Festival. Channel 4 Films recently claimed Weir’s vision of Australian isolationism “paved the way for Mad Max and countless other pictures.”

Everett DeRoche

Patrick: The man that inspired the spitting scene in Kill Bill.

“It wasn’t until Carrie and The Exorcist came along that the horror really began to take off in Australia,” says scriptwriter Everett DeRoche. “That was what got the investors interested. It wasn’t until those films came out that things began to heat up commercially for horror movies.”

If there is anyone well placed to talk about the emergence of Australian horror during this period, it is DeRoche. Together with Producer Anthony Ginnane he helmed what must be regarded as Australia’s most prolific periods of cinema by any standard. DeRoche’s list of work includes Patrick, Long Weekend, Harlequin, Snapshot, Razorback, Roadgames and Link amongst others.

“Horror always came naturally to me” says DeRoche. “I’ve always been fascinated by the dark side. And all my kids are the same way. They put it down the fact that I’m actually from Maine. There’s something innately creepy about Maine. Stephen King has captured it quite well in his work.” Having grown up in the US Everett believes he may have had a certain advantage at the time through noticing the fears and obsessions taken for granted in the Australian lifestyle. “I tended to think the best Australian films were made by outsiders. Things like Walkabout and Wake in Fright. Maybe immigrants tend to notice things that locals miss or something.”

Patrick (1976), directed by Richard Franklin, remains one of DeRoche’s most memorable excursions. “One hundred and sixty pounds of limp meat hanging from a brain!” lectures the doctor, plying his scalpel through the skull of a squirming frog to illustrate the point. “Can you imagine anything less aware than that?” This is, of course, the story of a sexually repressed psychotic wreaking havoc from the grips of a coma. But while the film (hopefully) embraces a more universal theme, DeRoche says that living in Australia did ultimately inform the way he approached his work. “I probably ended up having more knowledge of Australia than I did of the United States. Growing up in Southern California, if we went anywhere we’d go to Southern Mexico to go surfing. Consequently my geographic knowledge of the States was very limited, whereas I’d seen quite a bit of Australia. And I think that’s changed the way I’ve approached some of my stories. I’ve always been impressed by the fact that you can jump in your car and drive for half an hour and get seriously lost. I guess this happens in other places too, but it somehow seems more apparent in Australia.”

None more so than in Roadgames. Penned by DeRoche shortly after Patrick, this film is considered by many to be director Richard Franklin’s Hitchockian masterpiece. Essentially Rear Window recalibrated to the windscreen of a truck crossing the Nullarbor, the film is a triumph of suspense and menace wrapped in the brooding mettle of the outback.  It is a testament to the sadly unsung talents of late Franklin, who eventually based himself in the States to direct the genre films for which he demonstrated such flair (among them Psycho II). “All of these films did better overseas” says DeRoche. “They weren’t well received in Australia at the time. I don’t know how long they lasted at the Box Office. But it wasn’t long.”

Which brings us to Razorback. Jaws-meets-Priscilla when a rabid boar tears the bejesus out of a threadbare desert community. The schizophrenic play between Hollywood and Australian sensibilities was never more evident than when the beer-swilling locals prove scarier than the beast. But DeRoche has grown fond of Razorback over the years. “At the time I wasn’t that thrilled with the script” he reflects. “I actually wasn’t all that excited about doing a movie about a giant critter. But Russell Mulcahy came along and gave it a kind of style that wasn’t there in the script. So it’s kind of gratifying when I’ve written a less than brilliant script and it’s able to be made into something more than it was.” Razorback has gone on to become a cult classic.

THE 1980s AND BEYOND:  HELL AND HIGH WATER

By the mid 80s director Brian Trenchard-Smith had also became a notorious name, creating such splatter pieces as Turkey Shoot in which prisoners from a futuristic prison were turned loose in the scrubland for a frenzied manhunt. “A sadistic, ultra-violent catalogue of sickening horrors” dourly noted David Stratton. Tarantino agreed – he is a huge fan. Dead End Drive In, in which marauding cavalcades of youth are barricaded in an old drive-in cinema by the government, remains his favourite Trenchard-Smith outing.

Other notable horror films from this time include Rolf De Heer’s Incident at Raven’s Gate where aliens invade a farm (perhaps our answer to Repo Man) – the engaging script and performances, particularly from young Steve Vidler, make this an overlooked entry. As is Alex Proyas’ Spirits of the Air, Gremlins in the Clouds, where a brother and sister wandering a bat infested, post apocalyptic desert while being dogged by a ‘stranger’. Cassandra, a film about a psychic girl whose subconscious memories raise hell in Melbourne, is also memorable.

Melt.

Outback Vampires (vampires set up terrifying shop – in the outback!) and the slasher-derivative Nightmares signalled the more sardonic arrival of the 80s and 90s.  Thickly glossed in schlock, often pushing social parody to the point of comedy, a host of splatter films stick to this era like mud; Body Melt (a flesh eating virus sets a community into literal melt down), Bloodlust (three vampires sluice their bloody way through Melbourne’s criminal underbelly), Bloodmoon (schoolgirls carved up), Cut (actresses carved up) and, lastly, the disastrous bluster of Houseboat Horror (everyone, including rock band, carved up).

Wolf Creek perhaps marked a grittier convergence of this disparate lineage. While the story could have come from the frontal lobe of Terry Bourke, it is the dark weaving of the land as a character that makes the film so chillingly effective. Says McLean: “Horror has to keep being reinvented. It keeps needing to be transformed. You wait for horror movies that test how scared you can possibly be and that use cinema to show you something terrifying that you’ve never seen before, and suddenly the bar is set at that level.”

That new level has resulted in an overwhelming resurgence of passion from a new generation of writers and directors. And that apocalyptic stage has now gone global. Shortly after Wolf Creek was brought by the Weinsteins, Saw found its offshore funding and on to make more than $55 million in the US alone. More recently, after a successful debut at Cannes, Andrew Trauki’s Black Water  (an intense, lean tale involving three people and a salt-water croc) has sold to 76 countries. “The horror market provides the perfect resources for the new film maker to plunder” says Trauki. “You don’t need big stars, and a lot of the time you don’t need a huge budget. For new talent it’s an accessible entry genre.” Released around the same time as Greg McLean’s similarly themed Rogue, Black Water unfortunately received minor local release.

Other screwturners from the new guard include the colonial cannibalism of Michael Brougham’s Dying Breed and Jamie Clink’s Storm Warning, a DeRoche story about a couple tortured by out-of-towners. Clink has also just finished shooting a remake of his 1976 horror classic Lost Weekend, with Claudia Karvan and Jim Caviezel playing the holidaying couple terrorised by wild bushland. In a testament to the original, Clink asked DeRoche not to alter the script. “Although I had to find the original script first” adds DeRoche. “There was only one dog-eared copy – this is long before computers – with pencil notes all through it. But the acting is probably the most dramatic thing to have changed. The standard has been raised quite a bit since the 70s. Having Claudia Karvan has been a real bonus. Also, the location is a lot better. One thing I didn’t quite like about the original is that it looked too pretty. This time around we used Wilson’s Promontory. The weather is a lot darker and more changeable.”

This renewal of interest may indicate that our horror cinema is finally getting the reappraisal generally reserved for Italian, European and American varietals. “I’d like to know were all these people were thirty years ago!” laughs De Roche. One senses that it has indeed been a long road. And amongst the pitfalls, screams and general plundering of obsession, from the sublime to the perverse and derelict, the plight of the Australian Horror Movie has itself endured tremendous adversity. Is this the real overarching ‘tradition’ spanning the lengths of our horror screen heritage then? Perhaps. Regardless, until the retrospective festivals finally catch up, many of our national horror obscurities are definitely worth digging from the vaults. Or at least the dustier shelves of the video shop.

By Geoff Stanton